Re: ITK: debmake

2006-01-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 02:50:36PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Saturday 31 December 2005 18.48, Osamu Aoki wrote: > [debmake] > > > As I see in debian-reference: This should have been developers-reference :-) > > --- > > A.3.2 debmake > > > [...] > > However, it's not a bug to use debma

Re: ITK: debmake

2006-01-01 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Saturday 31 December 2005 18.48, Osamu Aoki wrote: [debmake] > As I see in debian-reference: > --- > A.3.2 debmake > [...] > However, it's not a bug to use debmake. > --- > I should remove last sentence from all translations. Or just drop mention of debmake alltogether? The description of the

developers-reference update for ITK: debmake

2006-01-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 06:22:20PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As I see in debian-reference: Of course, it is developers-reference :-) > > --- > > A.3.2 debmake > > > > debmake, a precursor to debhelper, is a more coarse-grained debian/rules > > assis

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-31 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I see in debian-reference: > --- > A.3.2 debmake > > debmake, a precursor to debhelper, is a more coarse-grained debian/rules > assistant. It includes two main programs: deb-make, which can be used to > help

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-31 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > There are less than 80 packages in unstable still using it, and there > is an excellent package called debhelper which can do everything that > debmake does and probably much better, so it does not make much sense > to keep debmake al

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-30 Thread Santiago Vila
Ok, to make things gradual, this is what I plan to do: * Announce this in -devel-announce to celebrate the new year. * Wait a few weeks. * Submit wishlist bugs against all packages affected (which I hope they will not be as much as 78 by then). * After the release of etch, debmake will be remov

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-30 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Friday 30 December 2005 03.18, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Santiago: > > > As a realistic goal, I estimate that etch will be the last release > > > containing debmake, but of course, I would be deligthed to see it > > > happen sooner. > > > > It woul

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-30 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Friday 30 December 2005 03.18, Anthony Towns wrote: > Santiago: > > As a realistic goal, I estimate that etch will be the last release > > containing debmake, but of course, I would be deligthed to see it > > happen sooner. > > It would be pretty lame if we couldn't do this in less than a year..

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-30 Thread Frank Küster
Santiago Vila wrote: > Therefore, I hereby announce my Intention To Kill debmake. Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >emacspeak I think this has been orphaned, and is waiting for adoption. Cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Frank -- Frank Kü

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Stage 2. "Please switch away from debmake". > This is the stage that starts today. So, everybody please, switch away > from debmake. [...] > *) If you are the maintainer of lintian or a similar tool, you are welcome > to add a check t

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-29 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:59:22AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I've adopted gnubg with Corrin's permission and this is now fixed in the > version just uploaded yesterday. Here's an updated and now hopefully complete list that also takes into account build-depends-indep. Removing gnubg from the l

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Corrin Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >gnubg I've adopted gnubg with Corrin's permission and this is now fixed in the version just uploaded yesterday. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: ITK: debmake

2005-12-29 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > There are less than 80 packages in unstable still using it, and there > is an excellent package called debhelper which can do everything that > debmake does and probably much better, so it does not make much sense > to keep debmake al

ITK: debmake

2005-12-29 Thread Santiago Vila
Greetings. There are less than 80 packages in unstable still using it, and there is an excellent package called debhelper which can do everything that debmake does and probably much better, so it does not make much sense to keep debmake alive forever. Therefore, I hereby announce my Intention To