On May 13, David Engel wrote
> This problem is not that simple. With the current dpkg, there is no
> way to fix this even with a statically linked cp or ln. This is
> because dpkg will remove ld-linux.so.1 before any postinst script gets
> a chance to repair the damage.
How about putting somethi
On May 13, joost witteveen wrote
> > On May 11, joost witteveen wrote
> > > I just downgraded my ldso from the one in unstable, to the one
> > > in bo, and I appear to be left with a system that doesn't have
> > > a dynamic linker!
> >
> > This is because of a change from a hard link to a symlink
> On May 11, joost witteveen wrote
> > I just downgraded my ldso from the one in unstable, to the one
> > in bo, and I appear to be left with a system that doesn't have
> > a dynamic linker!
>
> This is because of a change from a hard link to a symlink in one of
> the 1.9.x versions. I'm not sure
3 matches
Mail list logo
