On 12 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
> On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
> e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system, and makes no
> pretense of such. They will happily hand over records if needed.
Equally the information you supply
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it was mailed from a dummy hotmail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and the
> originating IP was from an ISP in Norway.
On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(James A. Treacy) writes:
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
No, that was version 1.5, at least according to the filename. The
date of download I have is 3 March 1
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
> > before?
no, that was version 1.5.
> Did it co
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
> before?
Did it come from anyplace interesting, out of curiousity?
Ciao,
--
David Welton
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
Jay Treacy
6 matches
Mail list logo
