Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze

2025-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Cyril Brulebois (2025-05-12): > I do realize it might make some maintainers nervous as the next few days > are the last ones before the hard freeze (scheduled 2025-05-15), and I > do apologize for creating this awkward situation. The very few packages that were out of sync betwee

Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze

2025-05-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
gt; unstable, and rely on the block-udeb hints to prevent our packages > from reaching testing at an inconvenient time? I've just done some picking and choosing between packages that show up on <https://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html>; some of them looked like things I needed or

Re: Upcoming d-i release vs. hard freeze

2025-05-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:58:10 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: For various reasons, I'll be trying to get D-I Trixie RC 1 out this week, and I might freeze udeb-producing packages right away, or in the very next few hours/days. As a general rule, would you prefer maintainers of udeb-prod

Re: I cannot upload since yesterday

2025-04-17 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
> I uploaded on Monday using the ssh-upload target. Have you tried that > one? No I just tried regular dput, but it seems to have started working again now. -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di senso, ragione ed intelletto

Re: I cannot upload since yesterday

2025-04-16 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
meout. Reconnect. > Sorry. > > Is it just me? I uploaded on Monday using the ssh-upload target. Have you tried that one? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez

I cannot upload since yesterday

2025-04-16 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello, anyone else has the same problem as me? I've been trying to do an upload since yesterday night but it keeps failing. Uploading fortunes-it_2.14-1_amd64.changes: 421 Data timeout. Reconnect. Sorry. Is it just me? -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso D

Bug#1095307: ITP: golang-github-crawshaw-iox -- Go I/O utilities

2025-02-06 Thread Simon Josefsson
: Go I/O utilities https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-crawshaw-iox https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-github-crawshaw-iox/-/pipelines /Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1094774: ITP: librust-rip-starttls-dev -- sans I/O implementation of IMAP starttls

2025-01-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
/tree/master/rip-starttls * License : Expat Programming Lang: Rust Description : sans I/O implementation of IMAP starttls rip-starttls is a sans I/O implementation of starttls for the IMAP protocol, as well as feature-gated I/O connectors. This package is needed for recent release

Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root

2025-01-24 Thread Philip Hands
>> general advice on preseeding if you haven't used it before). Something >> like this should work: >> >> d-i preseed/late_command string mkdir -p /target/root/.ssh; echo 'ssh-rsa >> ...' >/target/root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > An easy way to do that

Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root

2025-01-24 Thread Philip Hands
Colin Watson writes: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:40:50AM +0100, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: >> Hello, I would like to customize the debian-installer in order to allow root >> access once installed via an authorize key. >> >> so I need to put something like thi

Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root

2025-01-24 Thread Emanuele Rocca
;t used it before). Something > like this should work: > > d-i preseed/late_command string mkdir -p /target/root/.ssh; echo 'ssh-rsa > ...' >/target/root/.ssh/authorized_keys An easy way to do that with preseeding, assuming your setup has network connectivity, is a

Re: Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root

2025-01-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:40:50AM +0100, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, I would like to customize the debian-installer in order to allow root > access once installed via an authorize key. > > so I need to put something like this in the /root/.ssh/ during the > install

Is it possible to customise the d-i just to add an ssh authorized key for root

2025-01-24 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I would like to customize the debian-installer in order to allow root access once installed via an authorize key. so I need to put something like this in the /root/.ssh/ during the installation echo "ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQDGkFpSsCIGpAJtsH4TWHCatHMkdGMS/PTG2M/7xeW

Life or death report about Juan Carlos I (De Borbón Y de Roma) and José Luis Martínez Almeida

2024-04-21 Thread José Luis González González
I have just emailed registro.plazadecasti...@madrid.org (main tribunals in Madrid) and denunc...@agenciatributaria.es (Tax office in Spain) about a crime by the Madrid Major house chained from Juan Carlos De Borbón Y De Roma of which I the email didn't even show up in my Gmail

Bug#1055162: ITP: libhinoko -- I/O library for IEEE 1394 isochronous communication

2023-11-01 Thread Takashi Sakamoto
: LGPL-2.1-or-later Programming Lang: C Description : I/O library for IEEE 1394 isochronous communication This package contains library to operate 1394 OHCI hardware for transmission of isochronous packets in IEEE 1394 bus. It is a sister library of libhinawa (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-30 Thread Don Armstrong
ical reason why it couldn't be done for both, but at the time I implemented it, I didn't fully understand how much utility people would find from it. [I underestimated the value of being able to mail multiple bugs at the same time and use "Control: tag -1 foo".] [Enabling it f

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Marvin Renich
BTS is not as rich as e.g. a typical > bugzilla installation in this regard. Though I guess not having a fixed > version and not having the wontfix tag usually suggests the report was > invalid. How hard is it to add a 'notabug' tag? ...Marvin

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
n this regard. Though I guess not having a fixed version and not having the wontfix tag usually suggests the report was invalid. >This bug won't be fixed. Possibly because this is a choice >between two arbitrary ways of doing things and the maintainer >

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Marvin Renich
the search page. Except that in the general case, this is not very useful for avoiding the duplicated filing of a bug that has already been discussed and rejected. > All that aside, in this particular case I closed the bug because it wasn't > actually a bug, but rather a PEBKAC issue (u

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Marvin Renich
* Russ Allbery [230925 12:43]: > Marvin Renich writes: > > > I've seen differing opinions about closing "wontfix" bugs, but as a > > I think it's a trade-off. Which is why I said there are differing opinions. This has come up on this list before. >

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
cause this is a choice between two arbitrary ways of doing things and the maintainer and submitter prefer different ways of doing things, possibly because changing the behaviour will cause other, worse, problems for others, or */possibly for other reasons./* "I don&#

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:55:16PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > All that aside, in this particular case I closed the bug because it wasn't > actually a bug, but rather a PEBKAC issue (user complaining that a program > wasn't respecting his locale when he had LC_ALL s

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Closed bugs are available for direct search for 30 days after they're closed. After that you can still search them by selecting either "Archived" or "Archived and Unarchived" under "Misc Options" on the search page. All that aside, in this particular case

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Marvin Renich writes: > I've seen differing opinions about closing "wontfix" bugs, but as a > user, I appreciate when they are left open. Whether it is a simple > wishlist feature request or a crash when the user abuses the software, > if I go to file the same or simi

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Marvin Renich
* Jonathan Kamens [230925 07:17]: > Hi all, > > I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at > once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org with "Control: > tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my message body

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Thank you! A canonical answer at last. On 9/25/23 10:53, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 07:16:56AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debia

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 07:16:56AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at > once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org with "Control: > tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my mes

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I did find this here <https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS> after I emailed > the list: > >QUESTION: Can you do all the control-server actions by using fields >in a pseudo header in an ema

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
...and I just successfully used a Control: header in an email to ###@bugs.debian.org, so the only question remaining in my mind is whether the one that didn't work failed because it was sent to ###-done, or failed because of the base64 encoding. I can't think of any other reaso

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 02:44:19PM +0100, Peter B wrote: > On 25/09/2023 14:25, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > > > > So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to > > ###-d...@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all? > > > > It should work if the syntax is correct. The + character

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
MIME part it was included in was base64-encoded, and if not, what other reason could explain why it didn't work? I did find this here <https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS> after I emailed the list: QUESTION: Can you do all the control-server actions by using fields in a pse

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Peter B
On 25/09/2023 14:25, Jonathan Kamens wrote: So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all? It should work if the syntax is correct. The + character was missing.

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 02:06:44PM +0100, Peter B wrote: > > I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag > > all at once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org with > > "Control: tags ### wontfix" as the first line of m

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all? On 9/25/23 09:06, Peter B wrote: On 25/09/2023 12:16, Jonathan Kamens wrote: Hi all, I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag

Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Peter B
On 25/09/2023 12:16, Jonathan Kamens wrote: Hi all, I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org with "Control: tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my message body. The bug was

Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

2023-09-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Hi all, I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at once by sending my explanation to ###-d...@bugs.debian.org with "Control: tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my message body. The bug was closed but the tags command wasn't proces

how-can-i-help by default [Re: lpr/lpd]

2023-09-25 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 9/25/23 14:08, Paul Wise wrote: The problem with that approach is that the help needed information changes independently to packages, so the information will get very out of date in between point releases, which is why how-can-i-help does online checks. If desired, it would be easy to

Bug#1050969: ITP: v-i -- An alternative Debian installer using vmdb2 and ansible

2023-08-31 Thread Christopher Obbard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christopher Obbard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, chris.obb...@collabora.com Package name: v-i Version : 0.4 Upstream Contact: Lars Wirzenius URL : https://gitlab.com/larswirzenius/v-i License : GPL

Bug#1038161: ITP: xnvme -- Cross-platform libraries and tools for efficient I/O and low-level control.

2023-06-16 Thread Simon A. F. Lund
ng Lang: C Description : Cross-platform libraries and tools for efficient I/O and low-level control. xNVMe provides a library to program storage devices efficiently from user space and tools to interact with them. xNVMe is strongly motivated by the emergence of storage devices providing I/O comma

Bug#1037950: general: I had VBoxService installed in /sbin, but the program did not start

2023-06-14 Thread Bert Nijhof
Package: general Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: lammert.nij...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Virtualbox installed Guest Additions and I use VBoxService in Conky. It did not work. Also when I type it in the terminal the program does not start, while in all other distros it works. Here I had to start

Bug#1037487: ITP: trantor -- Non-blocking I/O cross-platform TCP network library

2023-06-13 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
++ Description : Non-blocking I/O cross-platform TCP network library Trantor is a non-blocking I/O cross-platform TCP network library, using C++14. Drawing on the design of Muduo Library This package is needed by weakforced as a transitive dependency of drogon, which I also intend to package. For

Re: Closure of buster-backports (WAS Re: buster-10-backports: I need backported network-manager for buster ASAP.)

2023-03-26 Thread ijaaskelainen
Thank you for your reply again. I can also build it from source. The HP MINI 10.1" INTEL ATOM N450 battery completely died two days ago so I could not use it instantly anyway since the laptop does not boot now. I wanted it fast-track , faster than I could get the dependencies. I propabl

Closure of buster-backports (WAS Re: buster-10-backports: I need backported network-manager for buster ASAP.)

2023-03-26 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:55:28PM +0300, ijaaskelai...@outlook.com wrote: > I absolutely need my Broadcom b43 to be the most advanced "device" in > my home country and for my home country. And for the EU, get the point? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B43 > > Kind

Re: buster-10-backports: I need backported network-manager for buster ASAP.

2023-03-25 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:45:57AM +0200, ijaaskelai...@outlook.com wrote: > Kind regards, Ilari Jääskeläinen. I wonder if you could explain *why* you need this so immediately and also why you asked all the Debian developers at once, please. There may be a better way to request that Deb

buster-10-backports: I need backported network-manager for buster ASAP.

2023-03-22 Thread ijaaskelainen
Kind regards, Ilari Jääskeläinen.

Bug#1030361: ITP: libblkio -- library for high-performance block device I/O with support for multi-queue devices

2023-02-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
: MIT or Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Rust, C Description : Library for high-performance block device I/O with support for multi-queue devices Applications are increasingly integrating high-performance I/O interfaces such as Linux io_uring, userspace device drivers, and vhost-user device

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Niels, Thanks for the explanation (snipped here). On 2022-12-15 11:59, Niels Thykier wrote: Your options include:  * Migrate to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" if you can Great, this indeed gets around the issue. Best wishes, Andrius

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Niels Thykier (2022-12-15 10:59:10) > Long story short: > > * Bug in fakeroot (#1023286 + #1024544) > * Me thinking it was a bug in debhelper so I tried to fix it > (which did not work and broke on the way in) > * Me realizing it was a bug in fakeroot and

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Greetings, Niels, On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Andrius Merkys: Hello, On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote: I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test target in d/rules. The builds all fail, as described here

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Niels Thykier
Andrius Merkys: Hello, On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote: I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test target in d/rules. The builds all fail, as described here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2 and I do not understand why

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2022-12-15 11:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 12/15/22 10:34, Andrius Merkys wrote: However, I have no idea why '-o 0 -g 0' options are used. They do not seem to be used before. Recent changes in debhelper, see: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelpe

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/15/22 10:34, Andrius Merkys wrote: However, I have no idea why '-o 0 -g 0' options are used. They do not seem to be used before. Recent changes in debhelper, see: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/-/commit/ca66cf4bc74fe31b3d5c8131788e7fdd8731 https://salsa.

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote: I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test target in d/rules. The builds all fail, as described here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2 and I do not understand why. Any soul to

dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why

2022-12-15 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Greetings, fellow Debianites, I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test target in d/rules. The builds all fail, as described here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2 and I do not understand why. Any soul to help me with this

Bug#1020772: ITP: trexio -- TREX I/O library and data format to exchange the quantum chemistry data.

2022-09-26 Thread Evgeny
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Evgeny * Package name: trexio Version : 2.2.0 Upstream Author : Evgeny Posenitskiy * URL : https://github.com/TREX-CoE/trexio * License : (BSD) Programming Lang: (C, C++, Fortran, Python) Description : TREX I/O

Re: Temporary freezes of udeb-producing packages for d-i releases

2022-09-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
! Thanks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1018891: marked as done (general: Can't install fans on msi laptop due to missing ec_sys kernel. Command prompt modprobe ec_sys write_support=1, I get error: FATAL: Module ec_sys not found in dire

2022-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2022 21:33:03 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1018891: general: Can't install fans on msi laptop due to missing ec_sys kernel. Command prompt modprobe ec_sys write_support=1, I get error: FATAL: Module ec_sys not found in directory /lib/mo

Bug#1018891: general: Can't install fans on msi laptop due to missing ec_sys kernel. Command prompt modprobe ec_sys write_support=1, I get error: FATAL: Module ec_sys not found in directory /lib/modul

2022-09-01 Thread Psyho786
Package: general Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: velmory...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was

Re: d-i alpha release?

2022-08-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Holger, Holger Wansing (2022-08-28): > we have less than 5 months until the planned beginning of bookworm's freeze. > > What about a d-i alpha/beta release? > (there was no d-i release since the release of bullseye) Yes, I could have sent a mail to -boot@ as not everyone is

d-i alpha release?

2022-08-28 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, we have less than 5 months until the planned beginning of bookworm's freeze. What about a d-i alpha/beta release? (there was no d-i release since the release of bullseye) Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Bug#1014240: ITP: rust-blocking -- thread pool for isolating blocking I/O

2022-07-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
/blocking * License : Apache-2.0 or Expat Programming Lang: Rust Description : thread pool for isolating blocking I/O blocking provides a thread pool for isolating blocking I/O in async programs. . Sometimes there's no way to avoid blocking I/O. Consider files or stdin,

Bug#1003460: ITP: golang-github-mdlayher-socket -- low-level network connection type to provide asynchronous I/O

2022-01-10 Thread Benjamin Drung
* License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description : Package socket provides a low-level network connection type which integrates with Go's runtime network poller to provide asynchronous I/O and deadline support. MIT Licensed. The socket package provides a low-level network conne

Re: where can I find the binNUM informations ?

2021-12-24 Thread PICCA Frederic-emmanuel
thanks a lot. cheers Fred

Re: where can I find the binNUM informations ?

2021-12-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 07:40:44PM +0100, PICCA Frederic-emmanuel wrote: > Hello, I am trying to understand a problem in matplotlib on the mips64el arch > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=matplotlib&ver=3.3.4-2%2Bb1&suite=sid > > between 3.3.4-2 and 3.3.4-2+

where can I find the binNUM informations ?

2021-12-24 Thread PICCA Frederic-emmanuel
Hello, I am trying to understand a problem in matplotlib on the mips64el arch https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=matplotlib&ver=3.3.4-2%2Bb1&suite=sid between 3.3.4-2 and 3.3.4-2+b1 the tests started to failed. So I would like to know why this package was binNMU and the di

Bug#995704: ITP: golang-github-cloudwego-netpoll -- A high-performance non-blocking I/O networking framework, which focused on RPC scenarios

2021-10-04 Thread Yanhao Mo
* License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : A high-performance non-blocking I/O networking framework, which focused on RPC scenarios, developed by ByteDance. Netpoll is a high-performance non-blocking I/O networking framework, which focused on RPC scenarios, developed by

Bug#995696: ITP: casa-formats-io -- Code to handle I/O from/to data in CASA format

2021-10-04 Thread Ole Streicher
-formats-io.readthedocs.org * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Python Description : Code to handle I/O from/to data in CASA format The casa-formats-io package is a small package which implements functionality to read data stored in CASA formats (such as .image datasets). This

I am selling guest post service do you need

2021-09-20 Thread oksana diana
*Hi Sir,* *I am selling guest post service If you want to boost your website traffic and your site to Google's top-ranking then I’m offering you my websites for back-links or link placement. You can get good Domain and Page Authority Keyword-based websites links from me related to your d

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:19:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > If we want to make buildd chroots merged-/usr any time soon, then I > think we need to say this class of bugs is RC for bookworm. I fear there might be a logic trap here. For a moment, let us assume perfection o

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-18 Thread Tim Woodall
asoning about the correctness of the solution. --Sam I'm not proposing this as a solution, or even a part solution, but I have a script that generates a set of Depends: between essential packages that (I believe) guarantees that they will install and will (I hope) "fail" if no suc

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 10:43 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/18/21 12:21 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 20:17, Simon Richter wrote: > > > > I agree that it's likely the only thing we can do with the version of > > >

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-18 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 8/18/21 12:21 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 20:17, Simon Richter wrote: I agree that it's likely the only thing we can do with the version of dpkg that we ship now, and that will have to handle the upgrade for any users that move from one stable release to the

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: Luca> Wouldn't a pre-depends solve the ordering problem in this Luca> case? No. At least it's really hard to prove that it does, we have a bad track record of getting it wrong, and if it were to work in a specific instance it would depend on implem

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Simon, Thanks so much for your comprehensive answer. It's a great summary that I think would be really useful for those of us who are package maintainers who don't have a strong position one way or another vis-a-vis usrmerge vs merged-/usr-via-symlink-farms, but just want to do what i

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
ot; symlinks > > /bin -> usr/bin, etc. are unsupportable, and the only correct way to > > consolidate static files to be physically located under /usr is to > > gradually build up symlink farms below /bin and so on. > > I agree that it's likely the only thing we can do wit

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 15:08, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > Luca> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 12:07 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > Luca> If src:usrmerge is made transitively-essential, from that > Luca> point onward it wouldn't matter if a package is n

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Simon Richter
static files to be physically located under /usr is to gradually build up symlink farms below /bin and so on. I agree that it's likely the only thing we can do with the version of dpkg that we ship now, and that will have to handle the upgrade for any users that move from one stable release to

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Simon McVittie
x86_64-linux-gnu/libext2fs.so.2 > W: ss-dev: breakout-link usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libss.so -> > lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libss.so.2 I don't know what the purpose of the breakout-link tag is, to be honest. It seems like it's often a false-positive, and I don't think these links a

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Theodore Ts'o
k at the reproducible-builds reports, but not all reproducible build failures are caused by the usrmerge/!usrmerge dependency, right? > If we want to make buildd chroots merged-/usr any time soon, then I > think we need to say this class of bugs is RC for bookworm. Agreed; I'd go further

Re: A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Simon McVittie
or testing and unstable). Ansgar did a survey of this when we were discussing one of the Technical Committee bugs, and reported that around 80 packages had a bug of this class at the time, which had apparently dropped to 29 by the time the TC resolution was voted on. If we want to make buildd chroo

A summary of where I think we are on the technical side of the merged /usr discussion

2021-08-17 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: Luca> On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 12:07 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: Luca> If src:usrmerge is made transitively-essential, from that Luca> point onward it wouldn't matter if a package is no longer Luca> compatible with the legacy split-usr setup

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-02 Thread Arne Pisch
Am 02.07.21 um 03:24 schrieb Paul Wise: On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:27 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: There's nothing especially wrong about using signed-by, but it's not the security fix some people seem to believe. In short, *any* package you install can run arbitrary commands as the root user on yo

[OFFTOPIC] partially-trusted debs (was Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug ...)

2021-07-02 Thread Antonio Russo
es without saying, if you're worried > about this, don't enable unattended upgrades for anything from that > repository. > I actually do this (for the wine and google-chrome [1] packages from their upstreams). You (at least) need to also check for any setuid binaries. Don'

Re: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Alex Muntada
Hi Andreas > BTW, I did some > >apt-key del 578A0494D1C646D1 > > added my key to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/fam-tille.gpg and added an > according > >[signed-by=/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/fam-tille.gpg] > > option to the sources.list line ... and it does not

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-07-02 01:24:09 + (+), Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:27 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > There's nothing especially wrong about using signed-by, but > > it's not the security fix some people seem to believe. In short, > > *any* package you install can run arbitrary comma

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:27 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > There's nothing especially wrong about using signed-by, but > it's not the security fix some people seem to believe. In short, > *any* package you install can run arbitrary commands as the root > user on your system during installation. Only e

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
t a "best practice" (ye gods how I despise > that term, but let's not go there today) insisting with an RFC 2119 > "MUST" that the key not be placed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d, and > that seems a bit extreme. I get that you were not the author of the > article, but

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-07-01 21:46:19 +0200 (+0200), David Kalnischkies wrote: > (Disclaimer: It was me who implemented Signed-By, also most of the > current monster apt-key is, trusted.gpg.d, … I might be a *tiny bit* > biased than it comes to apt and these topics as a result.) Thanks for that! I

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread David Kalnischkies
(Disclaimer: It was me who implemented Signed-By, also most of the current monster apt-key is, trusted.gpg.d, … I might be a *tiny bit* biased than it comes to apt and these topics as a result.) On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:40:31PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > maybe add some furt

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Kyle Edwards
FORMAT section which explains in greater detail. Thanks, I see this now. It sounds like sources.list is slowly becoming deprecated - I will consider migrating our repository instructions (and the associated convenience script) to use the deb822 *.sources format instead next time I'm muc

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-07-01 14:26:48 -0400 (-0400), Kyle Edwards wrote: > On 7/1/21 2:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > Also, as other's have stated, deb822 might be a cleaner way to > > express this. > > I'm a little confused - I thought deb822 was just a generic format >

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Kyle Edwards
On 7/1/21 2:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Also, as other's have stated, deb822 might be a cleaner way to express this. I'm a little confused - I thought deb822 was just a generic format used in various places throughout Debian, including in the Release files. Where specifically

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
he user.) It sounds like this > move was not necessary. Nevertheless, is it considered "wrong" to > do it this way? Should I have left it alone? Personal/professional opinion, it's not wrong. If anything it's more explicit about the intent, at least. It's just n

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Kyle Edwards
e /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d files that had been added, and automatically replace them with [signed-by=] attributes in the sources.list (with permission from the user.) It sounds like this move was not necessary. Nevertheless, is it considered "wrong" to do it this way? Should I have left it alone? Kyle

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-07-01 09:35:16 -0400 (-0400), Kyle Edwards wrote: > On 7/1/21 9:27 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > It's not clear (to me at least) that placing keys into > > /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d is deprecated > > According to > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty it is: > > > The key M

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Kyle Edwards
Spec/DeclarativePackaging <https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/Spec/DeclarativePackaging> for a potential solution. In fact, the automatic [signed-by=] migration that I implemented uses exactly this avenue, albeit in an explicitly non-malicious way that prompts the user first. Kyle

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2021-07-01 09:01:57 -0400 (-0400), Kyle Edwards wrote: [...] > If [signed-by=] isn't the way to go, then what is? I recently > updated the keyring package in our company's APT repository to > automatically migrate people to [signed-by=] since apt-key (and > with it /etc

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Kyle Edwards
On 7/1/21 8:27 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: I don't want to advertise signed-by=. We should aim to get deb822 format supported in python-apt next cycle, and then advertise a consistent use of deb822 .sources files. Including, but not limited to, having d-i create sources.list.d/.so

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:27:31PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > I disagree, and think this bug is a minor documentation issue, > > > your issue here is likely outside the computer. > > > > I stick to the opinion that apt-secure pointing to apt-key which &

Re: Bug#990521: I wonder whether bug #990521 "apt-secure points to apt-key which is deprecated" should get a higher severity

2021-07-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:18:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:02:43PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Control: severity -1 minor > > > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >