Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-21 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 08:15:21PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo was heard to say: > > OTOH, I wonder how much benefit binary diffs could really give. Since > every .deb is mostly gzip compressed data, wouldn't you often need to > retrieve the whole thing again anyway? > I believe in the thread I was

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-20 Thread Sven Rudolph
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think the ideal solution would be to have a caching proxy based on > > rsync to communicate with the upstream mirror, and http (or a new > > apt method) to communicate with apt. > > I was actually think

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the ideal solution would be to have a caching proxy based on > rsync to communicate with the upstream mirror, and http (or a new > apt method) to communicate with apt. I was actually thinking the other day about why couldn't apt support rsync://

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread Gabor Fleischer
On 19 May 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Its rather difficult to split package into the right amount of > chunks. Each chunk has some overhead for download and state > information (/var/lib/dpcg gets big). I think the idea of bindiffs > would be far more usefull. I wouldn't go as far. I'm not thi

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Gabor Fleischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi everyone, > > some days ago someone had a question about cutting a package into > parts. The answer was yes, and one of the reasons: it can decrease > the downloads which is espetially good if someone has modem... > > I was thinking about this

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread Mitch Blevins
In foo.debian-devel, you wrote: > I was browsing the debian-devel archives recently and came across an old > thread on distributing binary diffs of packages. Did anything ever come out > of > that? It looked pretty intriguing but even the program mentioned (xdiff) > seems > to have vanished f

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 02:51:20AM +0200, Gabor Fleischer was heard to say: > Hi everyone, > [snip] > > There could be a value in the control file like: Last-changed-version or > something similar. apt/dselect could decide from this wether it > needs to download

Re: Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread James Mastros
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 02:51:20AM +0200, Gabor Fleischer wrote: > I was thinking about this, and there's one thing which is not the > best it could be, I think: Let's see libc, and the packages that > are compiled from the same source, for example locales. [...] > > There could be a value in the

Hints about future improvements

1999-05-19 Thread Gabor Fleischer
Hi everyone, some days ago someone had a question about cutting a package into parts. The answer was yes, and one of the reasons: it can decrease the downloads which is espetially good if someone has modem... I was thinking about this, and there's one thing which is not the best it could be,