Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-19 Thread Andreas Metzler
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2007, Julien Cristau wrote: >> I don't see how that would be easier than subscribing to the PTS for a >> package you're co-maintaining. > Well, the problem is missing documentation - at least I was not > aware of this fact. That's why my

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Andreas Tille wrote: > Another question would be whether it would be reasonable if > Uploaders should be included in BTS mail in any case and whether > I should file a wishlist bug against debbugs or whether this > bahaviour is intended and it would be better to use a > packagi

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Julien Cristau wrote: I don't see how that would be easier than subscribing to the PTS for a package you're co-maintaining. Well, the problem is missing documentation - at least I was not aware of this fact. That's why my main intention was to initiate a Group maintenance

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 19:03:32 +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > >> I think so, see #397761. > > > I do not think so, since this would result in duplicat mail for all > > packages with maintainer=mailinglist. > > That's a minor problem that is very easily solved with a fil

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Marcus Better
Andreas Metzler wrote: >> I think so, see #397761. > I do not think so, since this would result in duplicat mail for all > packages with maintainer=mailinglist. That's a minor problem that is very easily solved with a filter rule in the MUA. Duplicates are not exactly rare, what with messages tha

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: >> Another question would be whether it would be reasonable if >> Uploaders should be included in BTS mail in any case > I think so, see #397761. I do not think so, since this would result in duplicat mail for all packages with maint

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Frank Küster
Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: >> Another question would be whether it would be reasonable if >> Uploaders should be included in BTS mail in any case > > I think so That will give duplicate mails for those packages with a mailing list in Maintainer. Regards, Fra

Re: Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Marcus Better
Andreas Tille wrote: > Another question would be whether it would be reasonable if > Uploaders should be included in BTS mail in any case I think so, see #397761. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Group maintainance howto and role of uploaders

2007-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I recently started group maintenance of libblitz0 together Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and just added myself to the Uploaders field. The package recently gathered a bug (#424644) but I got no e-mail notific personally. I draw the conclusion that BTS automatically only inform