On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 11:00 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I might also do NMU's for some of the more important packages, with a
> delay of 2 days, or 5 days minus the time since the last dependent
> package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
> on jade/opensp/openjade, an
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
>> on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*.
>
> I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because o
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes
> on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*.
I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because of the
new libosp4c2 package.
--
.''`. Aurelien
I'm planning to start making sure every package which fails to build
with the current toolchain has an RC bug submitted against it. In
most cases, this should simply involve setting Andreas Jochens'
already existing bugs to serious, although I'll confirm each before
doing this. Exceptions will in
4 matches
Mail list logo
