Hi Mo,
Am Mon, May 05, 2025 at 06:24:32PM -0400 schrieb M. Zhou:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> According to constitution A.1.6, would you mind helping us extend
> the discussion period by a week?
> https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
I hereby extend the discussion period by a week.
I admit that I con
Hi Andreas,
According to constitution A.1.6, would you mind helping us extend
the discussion period by a week?
https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
>From the feedbacks I've heard, there are a couple of problems we are
facing currently.
* Myself being confident in proposal A is one thing. Bu
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 2:49 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
> On 5/5/25 11:44, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> >> It is too rush to start to vote for this within 3 weeks
> >
> > Does this maybe sound like the GR call was premature?
> > The project consensus, especially after
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vo
On 5/5/25 11:44, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
It is too rush to start to vote for this within 3 weeks
Does this maybe sound like the GR call was premature?
The project consensus, especially after
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003, seems to say that we don't
want multi-month GR discussio
Hi,
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 16:13 +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Read section A.2 of the constitution: you can withdraw your ballot
> option, and the GR won't happen. Others may pick it up and carry it
> through to a GR, though.
There is that part though:
+---
| No new ballot options may be prop
Hi Mo (2025.05.05_15:15:01_+)
"The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks. The maximum discussion
period is 3 weeks."
This is surprising to me. Does that mean we must start to vote when we
reach the
maximum discussion period? I just thought I can go back and reply to
the detailed
issues in
Hi,
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 11:15 -0400, Mo Zhou wrote:
> It is too rush to start to vote for this within 3 weeks as I'm
> completely not available for involving into discussions.
It is two weeks unless something specific happens, so discussion period
might already have ended by now...
Ansgar
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:15:01AM -0400, Mo Zhou wrote:
More information can be found at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2025/vote_002
I guess this is still in "discussion period"? When does that
period end and
the vote begin?
That's described in
https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.en
On 5/5/25 01:58, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 09:24:45PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
More information can be found at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2025/vote_002
I guess this is still in "discussion period"? When does that period
end and
the vote begin?
That's descri
On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 09:24:45PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
More information can be found at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2025/vote_002
I guess this is still in "discussion period"? When does that period end and
the vote begin?
That's described in
https://www.debian.org/devel/constituti
On Friday, May 2, 2025 5:46:28 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time Debian
Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> A General Resolution has been started about Interpretation of DFSG
> on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
>
> More information can be found at:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2025/vot
Hi,
Le ven. 2 mai 2025, 12:47, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx <
secret...@debian.org> a écrit :
>
> More information can be found at:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2025/vote_002
This link leads to a broken page: the first internal link doesn't work so
you need to scroll down manually, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
