Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-18 Thread tibor simko
> "eb" == Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "gm" == Gergely Madarasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "jt" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: eb> GNUPLOT is not GPL, so it can not be linked with eb> libreadline. I am I right or drastically mistaken. (I must eb

Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Edward Betts wrote: > > > * Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to > > * distribute the modified code. Modifications are to be distributed > > * as patches to released version. > > Ahem... it look

Re: GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Edward Betts wrote: > * Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to > * distribute the modified code. Modifications are to be distributed > * as patches to released version. Ahem... it looks like gnuplot falls in the same category as pine and qmail.

GNUPLOT breaks GPL

1998-06-17 Thread Edward Betts
15:37:30 $ ldd `which gnuplot` libvga.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libvga.so.1 (0x4000c000) libreadline.so.2 => /lib/libc5-compat/libreadline.so.2 (0x40048000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x4006a000) libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40073000) libncurses.so.3.