Re: GNU protocol

1998-05-09 Thread Martin Schulze
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 10:03:03PM -0700, Darren wrote: > What is considered polite with packages that don't (seem) to be maintained by > the original author... say a package that came from sunsite that hasn't been > updated since '95 and the email address in the package is no good... > > I'm not

Re: GNU protocol

1998-05-09 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 10:03:03PM -0700, Darren wrote: > This might not be the right place, but I figure it's a good place to start... > > What is considered polite with packages that don't (seem) to be maintained by > the original author... say a package that came from sunsite that hasn't been >

Re: GNU protocol

1998-05-09 Thread sjc
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 10:03:03PM -0700, Darren wrote: > This might not be the right place, but I figure it's a good place to start... Usually is I have found :) > What is considered polite with packages that don't (seem) to be maintained by > the original author... say a package that came from

GNU protocol

1998-05-09 Thread Darren
This might not be the right place, but I figure it's a good place to start... What is considered polite with packages that don't (seem) to be maintained by the original author... say a package that came from sunsite that hasn't been updated since '95 and the email address in the package is no good