Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have them beat out on shear size, quality, integration of packages,
> and ease of updating.
Don't forget the most important aspect, security! :)
--
-
___ Debian GNU/Linu
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 06:00:11PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
> They already have 72MB of fixes for 5.1. :) (10MB of fixes to the
> libjpeg problem I mentioned earlier, 31MB for X fixes, and
> miscellaneous security fixes including programs that were accidentally
> setuid...)
Anyone want to hazard
"Steve" == Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> to exist? The Sparc trees, both hamm and slink, are completely
Steve> screwed up because about 200 packages in the tree depend on the
Steve> glibc that has been sitting in Incoming since May 4.
Actually the famous missing libc6_2.0.93-9
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
> That's assuming that we can get Hamm ready and ship it before RedHat's _next_
> release.
They already have 72MB of fixes for 5.1. :) (10MB of fixes to the
libjpeg problem I mentioned earlier, 31MB for
> Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
That's assuming that we can get Hamm ready and ship it before RedHat's _next_
release.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
--
"Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
>
> Huh?
>
> Who managed a new major version during a depp freeze?
It's not a major new version, it's the final release of the 0.99.xx
series; it would be very silly to release hamm with 0.99.xx and not
--On Sat, Jun 6, 1998 12:17 am +0100 "Edward Betts"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
>
Huh?
Who managed a new major version during a depp freeze?
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAI
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
--
Edward Betts http://www.hairnet.demon.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 matches
Mail list logo
