Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 16:12, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed >> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do? > > There is, but I doubt the built packag

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed > by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do? There is, but I doubt the built package will be accepted, we already had this problem in the pas

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 14:42, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit : > >> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arc

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 14:28, Philipp Kern wrote: > Dmitrijs, > > am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: >> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd >> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the >> build packages..

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit : > What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arch=mips&stamp=1353416035 > > Why is distribution (experiment

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Philipp Kern
Dmitrijs, am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: > To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd > above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the > build packages...? Or is it a new port for wheezy or something? (e.g. >

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thibaut Paumard [2012.11.20.1403 +0100]: > That's why we currently require a binary together with the source. It > tautologically proves that you successfully built it. Nope, it does not. It could also prove that you know how to use changestool to engineer a .changes file combining a

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 13:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in que

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question > >> with the host running Debian's kernel. > >

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 13:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit : >> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs >>> wrote: I currently do

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit : > On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs >> wrote: >>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in >>> question with

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question >> with the host running Debian's kernel. > > So how can you prove that the package builds? > I can give you my

Re: Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Jon Dowland
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question > with the host running Debian's kernel. So how can you prove that the package builds? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Fwd: procenv_0.9-1_source.changes REJECTED

2012-11-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
"Source-only uploads are not allowed." Why not? May I request a binNMU for the architecture (amd64) I upload? I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question with the host running Debian's kernel. For the package in question it is important to build in the same environment as t