Re: Fwd: Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy

2011-12-14 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 12/10/2011 07:43 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On 12/10/2011 11:07 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: >> There is an effort to develop a software target along with the open-FCoE >> stack. This would help reduce some of the cost by removing the need for >> target and possible a switch. (back to back configu

Re: Fwd: Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy

2011-12-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 12/10/2011 11:07 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: > There is an effort to develop a software target along with the open-FCoE > stack. This would help reduce some of the cost by removing the need for > target and possible a switch. (back to back configuration: FCoE > initiator to software target) You would

Re: Fwd: Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy

2011-12-10 Thread Jack Morgan
There is an effort to develop a software target along with the open-FCoE stack. This would help reduce some of the cost by removing the need for target and possible a switch. (back to back configuration: FCoE initiator to software target) You would still need a 10Gb adapter on both ends. There is

Fwd: Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy

2011-12-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Including debian-devel.. Original Message Subject:Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:01 +0530 From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Reply-To: r...@debian.org Organization: RESEARCHUT To: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Any suggestions? It is a n