At Sat, 23 Aug 2003 03:59:53 +0900,
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> I uploaded ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults (1.6.8-6) now.
> Packages built from ruby1.6 source package is simply renamed from
> ruby 1.6.8-5.
>
> I plan ruby 1.8 transition:
>
> - Wait a while until ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults are installed,
At Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:33:10 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> FU> Dmitry Borodaenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FU> libyaml-ruby1.8 (<- libyaml-ruby)
>
> I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
> Ru
At Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:37:17 -0500,
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:53, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> > Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > libtest-unit-ruby1.8 (<- libtest-unit-ruby)
>
> Actually, I now only maintain Test::Unit for Ruby 1.6. Since it became
> included with 1.8, akir
Hi,
I uploaded ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults (1.6.8-6) now.
Packages built from ruby1.6 source package is simply renamed from
ruby 1.6.8-5.
I plan ruby 1.8 transition:
- Wait a while until ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults are installed,
because these are NEW packages.
- Keep ruby-defaults to 1.6 for a
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
FU> Dmitry Borodaenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FU> libyaml-ruby1.8 (<- libyaml-ruby)
I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
Ruby CVS, there is little chance for a separation of libyaml-ruby1.8 in
the ne
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:53, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> libtest-unit-ruby1.8 (<- libtest-unit-ruby)
Actually, I now only maintain Test::Unit for Ruby 1.6. Since it became
included with 1.8, akira yamada maintains that version, and when 1.8 was
packaged I dropped s
Hi,
I've wrote initial draft of debian ruby policy
http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/ruby-policy.html/index.html
Comments are welcome.
First, I'll intent to package ruby-defaults soon, which provides ruby and
libruby packages in which this ruby policy documents is included, and
rename current ru
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 12:12, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Since ruby 1.8.0 was released recently, ruby developers will go to
> ruby 1.8.x, so that we, ruby maintenance team (akira, tagoh, ukai),
> are discussing about how to deal with Ruby 1.8 transition and trying to make
> debian ruby policy soon.
>
At Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:02:52 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
>
> As rightfully pointed out by Fumitoshi UKAI, this discussion belongs to
> the wider audience of debian-devel, especially since Ruby 1.8.0 was
> released today.
>
> NB: some points raised here can be of interest not only to Ruby
> dev
As rightfully pointed out by Fumitoshi UKAI, this discussion belongs to
the wider audience of debian-devel, especially since Ruby 1.8.0 was
released today.
NB: some points raised here can be of interest not only to Ruby
developers, but also to developers from other scripting languages.
Generic que
10 matches
Mail list logo