Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-12-11 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides > > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the > > canonical example. I recommend eliminating

Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 13:44]: >> So I change the priority to what ftpmaster thinks, wait a month for >> the entry to get purged and then change it back to what I think and >> get it? > > I would consider this as abuse, and al

Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 13:44]: > So I change the priority to what ftpmaster thinks, wait a month for > the entry to get purged and then change it back to what I think and > get it? I would consider this as abuse, and also, that was the reason why I wrote "(normally)".

Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 13:50]: >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides >> > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #26388

Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 13:50]: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides > > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the > > canonical example. I recommend eli

Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:06:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > As for the bugs requesting change of priorities in the Overrides > file, many appear to simply be ignored permanently. #263887 is the > canonical example. I recommend eliminating the overrides file for > packages of priority 'stan

Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough.

2006-11-28 Thread Nathanael Nerode
To start with, congratulations to the ftpmasters for keeping up with the NEW queue. Unfortunately, this email is going to be a case of damning with faint praise I'm seeing bugs which were filed as removal requests as early as August 14 which are still waiting for processing. Unfortunately, t