On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:46:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:55:19PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Why would we want to not always permit binary packages to depend on
> > packages of foreign architectures if these architectures are also release
> > architectures
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:55:19PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Niels Thykier (2016-02-02 23:27:21)
> > Britney does *not* look at Build-Depends. Only (Pre-)Depends.
> okay, thanks for clarifying!
> > So, Britney's dependency resolver ("InstallabilityTester") actually supports
> > al
Johannes Schauer:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> in #807312 Ansgar helpfully pointed me to [1]. I have no clue at all about
> britney but from my naive understanding I get that one of the things it does
> is
> to check if a source package's build dependencies and its binary packages'
> runtime dependencies
Hi,
Quoting Niels Thykier (2016-02-02 23:27:21)
> Britney does *not* look at Build-Depends. Only (Pre-)Depends.
okay, thanks for clarifying!
> So, Britney's dependency resolver ("InstallabilityTester") actually supports
> all of that. What is lacking is support for passing the information to t
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 23:07 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> My question is: why does it not just use dose3 just as the buildds
> are doing it?
How old is the dose codebase? The changelog.gz in the current Debian
package only goes back to 2012, which is more than a decade after
britney was origin
Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2016-02-02 20:40:38)
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:39:50AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > I see these haven't entered testing because:
> >
> > * 183 days old (needed 5 days)
> > * crossbuild-essential-arm64/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6-dev:arm64
> > * crossbuild-e
6 matches
Mail list logo
