Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Sven Rudolph
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I suggest to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as common identifier for Debian > > friends. In case we get the money (why should we ?) I suggest to pass > > 50% to Linux International and keep 50% for Debian. > > Please use an address at Linux International, no

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Sven Rudolph
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I suggest to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as common identifier for Debian > > > friends. In case we get the money (why should we ?) I suggest to pass > > > 50% to Linux International and keep 50% for Debian. > > > > Please use an address at Linux International,

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Jim Pick
> I have some computers up running in that challenge and I could easily > contribute there output to the debian group, if we are going to have > one. > > So will we have one, or will we do it each one by himself? It's up to you - nobody's really organized anything. Some people are already run

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Jim Pick wrote: > > > People did complain that we were promoting Debian to the > > detriment of Linux. > > Yes - but remember, some of the people participating in these > contests were acting pretty infantile. Instead of focusing on solving > the problem, they want their team to be at the top of

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Jim Pick
> People did complain that we were promoting Debian to the > detriment of Linux. Yes - but remember, some of the people participating in these contests were acting pretty infantile. Instead of focusing on solving the problem, they want their team to be at the top of the list at all costs, inclu

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-23 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I get the impression that you've been hoodwinked into thinking there > is an "official Linux team" - there ain't - there's a linuxnet.org > team, organized by those IRC guys. Last time, a good many different Linux interests were competing as linuxnet.org, and w

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-22 Thread Jim Pick
> > I suggest to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as common identifier for Debian > > friends. In case we get the money (why should we ?) I suggest to pass > > 50% to Linux International and keep 50% for Debian. > > Please use an address at Linux International, not one in the Debian > domain. It is not our

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-22 Thread Bruce Perens
> I suggest to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as common identifier for Debian > friends. In case we get the money (why should we ?) I suggest to pass > 50% to Linux International and keep 50% for Debian. Please use an address at Linux International, not one in the Debian domain. It is not our policy to com

Re: FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-22 Thread Sven Rudolph
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does this mean I can remove my des-solnet? I think so. > Anyway, we didn't win but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address processed > the most blocks of all email addresses. People on the des-solnet mailing list seem to be heading towards the Bovine RC5

FW: [NTSEC] (Fwd) DESCHALL Press Release

1997-06-20 Thread Michael Meskes
Does this mean I can remove my des-solnet? Anyway, we didn't win but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address processed the most blocks of all email addresses. Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr