These files include such things as fvwm, koules and xbill.
There doesn't seem to be any tools specifically for building packages.
I know the source for all the packages is kept under the source
directory, but these files aren't in their subcategory directory.
eg we have
ftp.debian.org/debian/dists
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 02:52:33PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:41:02PM +, John O Sullivan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
> > On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
> > theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) ap
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:41:02PM +, John O Sullivan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
> On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
> theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) appearing in this
> directory.
> Is this the correct behaviour? Is this r
Hi all,
I've noticed something that seems odd to me.
On ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source
theres a bunch of files (.dsc .diff .orig etc) appearing in this
directory.
Is this the correct behaviour? Is this related to the switch to
package pools?
I'm curious because the same thing isn
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 05:12:30PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> > At 01:30 +0200 1999-09-17, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > >where are you ? Where are the people who criticized the ftpmaster about
> > >beeing too slow ? It's time to show that you can do be
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 05:12:30PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 01:30 +0200 1999-09-17, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >where are you ? Where are the people who criticized the ftpmaster about
> >beeing too slow ? It's time to show that you can do better ...
> >
> >I /REALLY/ hope that someone will ste
At 01:30 +0200 1999-09-17, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
where are you ? Where are the people who criticized the ftpmaster about
beeing too slow ? It's time to show that you can do better ...
I /REALLY/ hope that someone will step up ! Even if the job is not always
funny this is a really useful job for De
Le Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Guy Maor écrivait:
> Hi, we're looking for somebody to help us with ftp maintainance by
Hey guys,
where are you ? Where are the people who criticized the ftpmaster about
beeing too slow ? It's time to show that you can do better ...
I /REALLY/ hope that
This does not sound like fun, but it sounds necessary. How much time
commitment is required? Must "somebody" already be a maintainer?
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Guy Maor wrote:
> Hi, we're looking for somebody to help us with ftp maintainance by
> If this sounds like fun, reply to this email.
>
>
Hi, we're looking for somebody to help us with ftp maintainance by
processing new packages from incoming. The procedure is basically
this:
You get a daily email report of new packages in Incoming.
You run lintian on them and check for egregious errors, read the
copyright file to see if its
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9804/msg01409.html
A reasonable amount of time has passed. I'll check a few randomly
selected mirrors and restore the links if all is well.
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
The link dists/stable -> ../bo has disappeared from the ftp archive.
According to the dists/README, this is supposed to be the canonical way
to access the different distributions.
Having something like the stable link disappear without any notice
makes it rather difficult to keep the web pa
"Meskes, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you sure nothing depends on the older tcl an tk versions?
If so, they need to be updated. We're only going to have 7.6/4.2 and
8.
I'll start running pkg-order on the archive on a regular basis and
file bugs on unmet dependencies.
Guy
--
TO
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: FTP Archive cleanup
>
> I had written a script which checks the archive for missing and extra
> source and binaries some time ago. I've finally acted on its output.
>
> I've orphaned any old source packages. Some
On 5 Jan 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
> Apparently there are some commercial packages which are only available
> in a.out format, so we ought to at least provide libc4. I don't think
> it's necessary to support development.
I agree. I think xcompat should also be provided, for the same reason.
Remco
I had written a script which checks the archive for missing and extra
source and binaries some time ago. I've finally acted on its output.
I've orphaned any old source packages. Some are obviously obsolete
(such as tcl74, tcl75, tk40, tk41). Others are useful but have no
active maintainer.
I'v
Michael E. Deisher writes ("Re: FTP archive"):
> On Thu, 28 Sep 95 19:20 EST, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >auto-pgp is not pgp. It is still under GPL. Please move it back
> > into the distribution. Ian Jackson is the author. You can ask him
&
On Thu, 28 Sep 95 19:20 EST, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>auto-pgp is not pgp. It is still under GPL. Please move it back
> into the distribution. Ian Jackson is the author. You can ask him
> yourself if you are in doubt. :-)
> Actually, Ian asked me to move it to non-free until
On Thu, 28 Sep 1995, Michael E. Deisher wrote:
> auto-pgp is not pgp. It is still under GPL. Please move it back into
> the distribution. Ian Jackson is the author. You can ask him
> yourself if you are in doubt. :-)
This might be a non-problem, but I thought I'd raise a flag on it
just in
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:47:52 -0700
From: Michael E. Deisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Sep 95 17:13 EST, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * auto-pgp and pgp has been moved into `non-free' due to the fact
> that it cannot be distributed commerc
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:29:57 -0700
From: Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> * ncurses-runtime has been moved into `misc'.
It belongs in "base". "dpkg" depends on it.
I was under the impression that the terminfo files for the common
terminals (linux and v
On Thu, 28 Sep 95 17:13 EST, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * auto-pgp and pgp has been moved into `non-free' due to the fact
> that it cannot be distributed commercially. Ian Jackson says that
> an earlier version of PGP that was distributed under the GPL can
> replace the newer, more r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> * ncurses-runtime has been moved into `misc'.
It belongs in "base". "dpkg" depends on it.
Bruce
--
-- Attention Radio Amateurs: For information on "Linux for Hams",
-- read the WWW page http://www.hams.com/LinuxForHams,
-- or e-mail the word "help" to [EMAIL P
Several changes were made to the FTP archive this morning:
* The binary, ms-dos, and source directories have been moved into
a subdirectory called `debian-0.93'. This will make it easier to
support two versions of the distribution at the same time.
* All packages in the `system' se
24 matches
Mail list logo
