Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-02-12 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:21:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Please keep in mind that compat 9 and earlier could use --parallel (and > compat 10+ can still use --no-parallel or --max-parallel), so these > numbers are at best rough guesstimates for the number of packages with > parallel enabled/disabl

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Niels Thykier
Jeremy Bicha: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10. > > Well start with > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version.html > > Thanks, > Jeremy Bicha > For the curious: * Dep

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 07:38:21PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:07:25PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > So this is _already_ done; at most individual packages might not use this > > option, either via an explicit opt-out, or by having old crufty packaging. > I wonde

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10. Well start with https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version.html Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:07:25PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > So this is _already_ done; at most individual packages might not use this > option, either via an explicit opt-out, or by having old crufty packaging. I wonder what percent of the packages has compat < 10. -- WBR, wRAR signature.a

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer) > using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1": > IMHO with todays multi-core CPUs -jX is a must: > - If I rebuild the full distribution, building mu

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 07:02:52AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > That is interesting. I build using gbp/cowbuilder and so I set these > environment variables: > > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=`nproc`" DH_VERBOSE=1 > > I was not previously aware of the distinction between -j and -J for > dpkg

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:37:08PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > > we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer) > > using "-j8". > Is that a dpkg-buildpackage option? It's documented to fail on certain > pac

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer) > using "-j8". Is that a dpkg-buildpackage option? It's documented to fail on certain packages, you need to use -J instead, and maintainers need to certify that a pack

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14929 March 1977, Philipp Hahn wrote: > we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer) > using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1": > With all the reproducible build stuff going on, I think it would be nice > if someone™ can also donate CPU time to check

FTBFS with parallel make

2018-01-26 Thread Philipp Hahn
Hello fellows, we (Univention GmbH) rebuild packages (from Debian-Jessie or newer) using "-j8". Several builds failed, but work when I use "-j1": * gcc-4.7 > mv: cannot stat 'stamps/07-install-stamp': No such file or directory > debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk:362: recipe for target > 'stamps/08