Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> software?
> regards nico
>
> --
> Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
> http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett schrieb:
>| The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
>| firmware.
>
> I am aware of that. That is what is on my list. Enabling support in the
> kernel should be trivial after that.
Ah, you want to add ACPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Matthew Garrett schrieb:
|>Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
|>list. :-)
| The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
| firmware.
I am aware of that. That is what is on my list. Enab
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
> list. :-)
The Pegasos doesn't support ACPI - it has no ACPI tables anywhere in its
firmware. To the best of my knowledge, it has nothing that approximates
it either. ACPI is a speci
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:05:35AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> >>Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
> >>list. :-)
>
> >Umm, why?
>
> Because it is the only way you can shut down PM capable PCI cards.
No, that's complete
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
list. :-)
>Umm, why?
Because it is the only way you can shut down PM capable PCI cards.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
> >included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
> >because the ACPI interface does not exist for an archi
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
> >included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
> >because the ACPI interface does not exist for an ar
Hi,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
because the ACPI interface does not exist for an architecture today that
it will never exist; it's not completely impossible that one
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Jeroen:
> > > Please also try to make your package actually FTBFS on systems not
> > > supporting acpi, if that's possible, besides limiting the Architecture
> > > line as you've already done.
> >
> > For one thing, when using dpkg-
Hello Wouter,
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 11:10]:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I read the policy, I know what it says.
>
> Okay, good :)
>
> (it would've helped if you had mentioned the following in your original
> mail...)
ok next time
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I read the policy, I know what it says.
Okay, good :)
(it would've helped if you had mentioned the following in your original
mail...)
* Jeroen:
> Please also try to make your package actually FTBFS on systems not
> supporting acpi, i
Hello Gergely,
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 11:56]:
> > does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> > buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> > software?
>
> If the arch is not supported by the package, why is it in the packages
> Architecture: line to
Hello Wouter,
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 11:56]:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:04:34PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> > buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> > software?
>
> You want to read Policy
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:04:34PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> software?
You want to read Policy. Really.
(specifically, section 5.6.7)
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR
> does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
> buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
> software?
If the arch is not supported by the package, why is it in the packages
Architecture: line to begin with?
--
Gergely Nagy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
does anyone knows a solution to let packages FTBFS on
buildd's which architecure are not supported by the
software?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beep
17 matches
Mail list logo
