Re: Excluding a binary package from Debian archives

2001-09-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar? > > Why not simply include them, so that Debian users in Gibraltar can use it? > Gibraltar is Debian-based, a firewall distribution bootable from CD-ROM. Ah. That changes things a

Re: Excluding a binary package from Debian archives

2001-09-21 Thread Steffen Neumann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wouter Verhelst) writes: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: [...] > Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar? IIRC Gibraltar is the name of a debian based firewall... Yours, Steffen

Re: Excluding a binary package from Debian archives

2001-09-21 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar? > Why not simply include them, so that Debian users in Gibraltar can use it? Gibraltar is Debian-based, a firewall distribution bootable from CD-ROM. But installing the gibraltar-bootsupport package on a Debian system that is in

Re: Excluding a binary package from Debian archives

2001-09-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel. [...] > packages mkinitrd-cd and gibraltar-bootsupport. But only the package > mkinitrd-cd is interesting for Debian users / developers, the > gibraltar-bootsupport package is very Gibral

Excluding a binary package from Debian archives

2001-09-21 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Hi all Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel. I am the maintainer of the mkinitrd-cd package and have made many improvements since the last release so, I would like to update it. But because of a restructuring of the package, the source package has been renamed from mki