On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 03:28:40AM +0100, наб wrote:
> I was expecting src:fuse-umfuse-ext2 to clear the RM queue by the time
> this was uploaded, so I didn't think to enumerate them earlier.
>
> Tested all, all fixed, closed all.
Many thanks for testing them and then closing them all. That was
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:29:19AM -1000, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:59PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > idk if you got a notification (the confirmation mail would indicate
> > otherwise?), but the patch is at #1085590. I've tested it to behave
> > the same as the real fuseext2 and
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:59PM +0200, наб wrote:
>
> idk if you got a notification (the confirmation mail would indicate
> otherwise?), but the patch is at #1085590. I've tested it to behave
> the same as the real fuseext2 and it upgrades smoothly.
I've uploaded e2fsprogs 1.47.2~rc1-1 to unss
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:44:46AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:13:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > I've implemented this but can't test it fully because
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git
> > is missing an up-to-date pristine-tar
> > (it's at 1.47.0 so
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:13:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
>
> I've implemented this but can't test it fully because
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git
> is missing an up-to-date pristine-tar
> (it's at 1.47.0 so it looks like you just forgot to push?).
Yes, that combined to some
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:53:29PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:56:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > ...but now that I look at this there's fuse2fs,
> > which is naturally better than some third-party implementation.
> >
> > The interface is a little different
> > (the default
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:56:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
>
> ...but now that I look at this there's fuse2fs,
> which is naturally better than some third-party implementation.
>
> The interface is a little different
> (the default is -o rw instead of -s -o ro,allow_other,default_permissions)
> so this
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 00:00:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 00:49 +0200, наб wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrot
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 00:00:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 00:49 +0200, наб wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> > > > I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per pol
On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 00:49 +0200, наб wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> > > I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
> > >
> > > As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os re
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> > I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
> >
> > As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒
> > RM: umview -- RoQA; obsolete, low pop
On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
>
> As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒
> RM: umview -- RoQA; obsolete, low popcon
> #1085454
> RM: fuse-umfuse-
Hi!
I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒
RM: umview -- RoQA; obsolete, low popcon #1085454
RM: fuse-umfuse-ext2 -- RoQA; dead upstream, low popcon #1085457
13 matches
Mail list logo
