> "LW" == Lars Wirzenius wrote:
LW> For those of you who have some free time, perhaps designing a flashy
LW> xdm login screen would be a better project. That is, something more
LW> sexy than the default criss-cross background with a dull, white
LW> "login:/Password:" window in the middle. It
"Susan G. Kleinmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PNG is a bandwidth-conservative, patent-free replacement for GIF (as well
> as many uses of TIFF). If you want to use it, you might be interested in
> looking at:
> http://www.boutell.com/boutell/png/
Thanks, Susan, that's what I meant to
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ Note: I read this mailing list. There is no need to CC me on replies,
> unless it is _really_ urgent. I pay for my PPP connections. Thanks. ]
Hmm, what if the debian lists had a Reply-to header that was the list
in question. That would cut down
[ Note: I read this mailing list. There is no need to CC me on replies,
unless it is _really_ urgent. I pay for my PPP connections. Thanks. ]
Jon Rabone:
> It's also available separately on (at least) the funet mirror sites in the
> same directory as the 2.0 source. I don't think we really ne
> On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Emilio Lopes) writes:
> >
> > > 2- The logo itself is a gif file. Is it non-free? I can convert it to
> > >a jpeg file if needed.
> >
> > Don't know about the other stuff, but for this I'd recommend png, not
> > jpeg.
PNG
> AD> I'm not convinced we need the package at all.
> AD> After all, you get the image with the kernel sources anyway.
>
> Sure? I didn't know that. It's really hidden in that "Documentation"
> dir...
> Anyway, maybe someone who does not want the sources may want the logo?
>
> ECL.
It's also av
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Rob Browning wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Emilio Lopes) writes:
>
> > 2- The logo itself is a gif file. Is it non-free? I can convert it to
> >a jpeg file if needed.
>
> Don't know about the other stuff, but for this I'd recommend png, not
> jpeg. As I understand it gif'
> "AD" == Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AD> I'm not convinced we need the package at all.
AD> After all, you get the image with the kernel sources anyway.
Sure? I didn't know that. It's really hidden in that "Documentation"
dir...
Anyway, maybe someone who does not want the sou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Emilio Lopes) writes:
> 2- The logo itself is a gif file. Is it non-free? I can convert it to
>a jpeg file if needed.
Don't know about the other stuff, but for this I'd recommend png, not
jpeg. As I understand it gif's lossless, and so is png, and I think
png was meant to
Hi,
I'm planning to do a package, erh, hm, ... it's the Linux-2.0 Logo
package :-).
But I have some doubts:
1- There is some trouble with dpkg naming it linux-2.0-logo_1.0-0.all.deb?
2- The logo itself is a gif file. Is it non-free? I can convert it to
a jpeg file if needed.
3- Where should
10 matches
Mail list logo
