Hi,
On 2017-08-01 23:24:20 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> Therefore, I propose filing ITPs for packages "docbook5", "docbook5-xsl",
> and "docbook5-xml". The packages initially would be based on DocBook 5.1,
> unless DocBook 5.2 is finalized in the meantime.
FYI, docbook5-xml has existed for years,
Guillem,
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 23:24:20 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> > I am creating a new XSLT file to convert DocBook 5 "refentry" (man page)
> > files to texinfo files on a non-Debian system. I would like to bring
> > DocBook 5 int
Hi!
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 23:24:20 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> I am creating a new XSLT file to convert DocBook 5 "refentry" (man page)
> files to texinfo files on a non-Debian system. I would like to bring
> DocBook 5 into Debian.
In a way, we already have some DocBook 5 support. :)
> Therefore
I am creating a new XSLT file to convert DocBook 5 "refentry" (man page)
files to texinfo files on a non-Debian system. I would like to bring
DocBook 5 into Debian.
DocBook 5 has incompatibilities with DocBook 4.x, so the two versions would
have to co-exist. I wanted to discuss this here before
4 matches
Mail list logo
