Hello,
On Sat 05 Oct 2019 at 10:13PM +01, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> I don't understand the argument of it being a social problem, isn't our
> own constitution a technical solution to a social problem?
Hmm, I think that "social problem" is not what I meant.
It's difficult to communicate effective
On 2019-10-06 22:02:19 +0100 (+0100), Roger Lynn wrote:
[...]
> As a non-DD and lurker, personally I like the NNTP interface at
> linux.debian.devel, which I believe is provided by Marco d'Itri.
[...]
Thanks for the reminder! I had forgotten this was even available,
and will strongly consider swit
On 05/10/19 22:20, Samuel Henrique wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 14:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Note that email already has a "tree-like" structure, since forever. You
just don't see it if you (ironically) use web application email clients
like gmail that decided to not show it. Most console/des
On 2019-10-05 22:13:49 +0100 (+0100), Samuel Henrique wrote:
[...]
> And the problems with relying on the tree view of email subthreads
> have already been exposed here as it depends on people formatting
> the subthread in a specific way, which does always happens.
[...]
Not necessarily. For me at
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 14:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >
> > > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> > > separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
> >
Hello,
On Wed 02 Oct 2019 at 11:30AM +02, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
> openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
> increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists where this is an
> often enco
On 2019-10-02 10:51:22 -0300 (-0300), Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >
> > > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> > > separate discussion threads when the topic chang
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> > separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
> >
>
> They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
>
Samuel Henrique writes:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
>> ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
>> separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
>>
>
> They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
> That's the "tree-like" structure that I men
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
>
They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
That's the "tree-like" structure that I mentioned in my email.
> You will defi
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
> openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
> increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists where this is an
> often encoun
* Jeremy Stanley: " Re: Bits from the DPL (August 2019)" (Tue, 1 Oct 2019
20:45:35 +):
Hi,
first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
