o help but probably someone else has
better resources (eg, bandwidth, or even physical space) than me.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:27:41PM +0200, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Some time ago, Martin Schulze pointed out that there is no developer
> accessible Hurd machine availab
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:46:24PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> If there is no permanent buildd running, I think most developers will
> not be able to identify hurd specific problems, even if they were very
> minor.
Well, there is a buildd, it's just not running at the moment (and it
dies frequently
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, you can still try to install the Hurd yourself on a free
> partition, for example using the crosshurd package. Most people have an
> i386, so it's just a matter of perhaps freeing some disk-space and
> reading the docs. If it doesn't work with yo
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:30:26PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> I think such a machine would be valuable to increase the quality
> of the Hurd port overall.
Maybe. But also keep in mind that porting to GNU/Hurd is a bit more
complicated than porting to just another Linux architecture, because of
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some time ago, Martin Schulze pointed out that there is no developer
> accessible Hurd machine available.
>
> I am happy to coordinate the donation of hardware for this if
Greetings,
Some time ago, Martin Schulze pointed out that there is no developer
accessible Hurd machine available.
I am happy to coordinate the donation of hardware for this if it is
this something that you (developers, Hurd and otherwise) feel would be
useful and possible? However, I've
6 matches
Mail list logo
