Greetings, and thanks so much for your helpful reply!
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no idea why you've copied this to the binutils upstream list,
> debian-devel, et cetera...
>
Well, upstream for some idea of their release and versioning number
plans, debian-devel as th
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:42:06AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> OK, but this is a pity. I still don't understand why this need be the
> case.
Because the interface between BFD and binutils is subject to change and
does on a regular basis, and there are not enough users to bother doing
anything m
Greetings!
Do we have a plan or policy regarding packages which need to depend on
binutils-dev? Is there now or will there ever be in the future a
stable binary api, by which I mean one that might be good for a year
or more of development on average? In such a case, would binary api
compatibilit
I have no idea why you've copied this to the binutils upstream list,
debian-devel, et cetera...
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:09:03AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Do we have a plan or policy regarding packages which need to depend on
> binutils-dev? Is there now or will there ever be
4 matches
Mail list logo
