Re: Debian and ISO C++ package management conversations

2021-11-06 Thread Daniel Ruoso
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thaddeus H. Black wrote: > Not an expert on the subject, I should be reluctant to reply on > list, except that 24 hours have passed and I see no other > replies on list yet; so here goes. Thanks, your comments are appreciated. > I did not know that to make modules

Re: Debian and ISO C++ package management conversations

2021-11-06 Thread Thaddeus H. Black
Daniel: Not an expert on the subject, I should be reluctant to reply on list, except that 24 hours have passed and I see no other replies on list yet; so here goes. On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:03:31PM -0400, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > During early discussion in the SG15 mailing list[3], it became clear

Debian and ISO C++ package management conversations

2021-11-04 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Hello, I have been involved in the conversations in the ISO WG21 (C++) SG15 (Tooling Study Group). Particularly in the context of trying to get a story straight on how C++ modules will interact with package managers. Over the past two months, I have released a couple[1] papers[2], trying to outli