Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:32:23AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
Also, as to the question of why is it a wiki, it's because wikis are
easier to edit and update than established documentation. The
documentation that can only be edited by a few is bound t
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:32:23AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
Also, as to the question of why is it a wiki, it's because wikis are
easier to edit and update than established documentation. The
documentation that can only be edited by a few is bound t
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:54:02AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> If you think they are useful, by all means go ahead and put them
> somewhere else. It's free documentation, you can do with it whatever
> you like.
>
> I do not feel that it is my duty to put these diagrams in the main
> Debia
Javier,
On 10/2/06, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PD: Notice that I'm not implying that a wiki is not a good resource for a OSS
documentation system (my opinion is quite the opposite), I'm just saying that
writting up documentation in two different wikis, at people.de
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:32:23AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> >May I ask why information this important is not on the main Debian
> >wiki, wiki.debian.org?
>
> It was born in the Debian Women wiki, because I felt much more
> comfortable doing this documenting proc
l+Purge of foo (Installed)), that
This is important information I would never have found due to the lack
of knowledge that the Debian Women project has her own wiki.
May I ask why information this important is not on the main Debian
wiki, wiki.debian.org?
It was born in the Debian Women wiki,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:42:17PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:52:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/MaintainerS
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Or to put it the other way, why isn't the developer's reference a wiki? :)
I think it's more likely to evolve that way.
Just as a side note, I am very interested in the possibilities of wiki
software being used to collaboratively develop more structure
documentation (l
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:52:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/MaintainerScripts states,
> >>while discussing the purging of a fully installed packa
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:52:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/MaintainerScripts states,
>>while discussing the purging of a fully installed package
>>("Removing and Purging", Removal+Purge of foo (Installed)), that
>
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:52:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/MaintainerScripts states,
>while discussing the purging of a fully installed package
>("Removing and Purging", Removal+Purge of foo (Installed)), that
This is important information I would never
11 matches
Mail list logo
