Joey Hess writes ("Re: Debian Policy 3.9.4.0 released"):
> That would include large numbers of haskell libraries and binaries that
> statically link other haskell libraries. Even though most such
> libraries actually have no source license requirements.
The requirement to ship
Joey Hess writes:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>> This sort of sounds like Built-Using: only needs to contain things
>> which the package doesn't already Depends: (or perhaps even
>> Recommends:) on. [Which would resolve the archive licensing
>> requirements.]
> To to usable to ensure GPL compliance,
Don Armstrong wrote:
> This sort of sounds like Built-Using: only needs to contain things
> which the package doesn't already Depends: (or perhaps even
> Recommends:) on. [Which would resolve the archive licensing
> requirements.]
To to usable to ensure GPL compliance, Built-Using needs to specify
Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Debian Policy 3.9.4.0 released"):
>> Well, I'll use that version once we get the multiarch changes in for
>> sure. :)
> 4.x surely :-).
Hm, I was hanging on to the 4.x version for rewriting the thing in DocBo
Joey Hess writes:
> It seems that this was intended to apply to standalone binaries embedded
> into things like d-i initrds (which already use it), but as it's written
> it seems to apply to static linking of libraries as well.
> That would include large numbers of haskell libraries and binaries
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:01:39AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > 7.8
> > > New `Built-Using' field, which must be used to document the
> > > source packages for any binaries that are incorporated into
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joey Hess wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> > 7.8
> > New `Built-Using' field, which must be used to document the
> > source packages for any binaries that are incorporated into this
> > package at build time. This is used to ensure that the arc
Russ Allbery wrote:
> 7.8
> New `Built-Using' field, which must be used to document the
> source packages for any binaries that are incorporated into this
> package at build time. This is used to ensure that the archive
> meets license requirements for
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Debian Policy 3.9.4.0 released"):
> Well, I'll use that version once we get the multiarch changes in for sure.
> :)
4.x surely :-).
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
Christian PERRIER writes:
> Thanks again and again for the great work maintaining the policy (and
> lintian as well).
> Given the quite important change of making build-{arch,indep} targets
> mandatory, wouldn't have been better to use something like 3.10.1 or
> anything clearly saying "hey, the
Quoting Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org):
> I've just uploaded Debian Policy 3.9.4.0, which includes the Technical
> Committee decision to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory targets
> (but not for wheezy; see below), a substantial rewrite of the section on
> shared library handling, and other
11 matches
Mail list logo
