Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin!
>
>> Afaik it is as simple as: The Filename entries are relative to the URL
>> you would put into the sources.list, as in:
>>
>> deb url path/
>> deb url dist +
>
> I see. But how does the mirror script know how the particular Packages
> file
Hi Goswin!
> Afaik it is as simple as: The Filename entries are relative to the URL
> you would put into the sources.list, as in:
>
> deb url path/
> deb url dist +
I see. But how does the mirror script know how the particular Packages
files are referenced from a (most probably remote) sources.l
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> > I changed my script to check whether the "Filename:" field is with a
>> > './' in front or not. Works for now. Probably another tweaking will be
>> > necessary in the future, but currently it is ok.
>>
>> The ./ is a sideeffect of dpkg-scanpa
Hi!
> > I changed my script to check whether the "Filename:" field is with a
> > './' in front or not. Works for now. Probably another tweaking will be
> > necessary in the future, but currently it is ok.
>
> The ./ is a sideeffect of dpkg-scanpackages. You should not rely on
> that but just reim
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> There are only 2 cases:
>>
>> Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
>>
>> You could have a Packages file with
>> 'dists///binary-/' that is used as if it hadn't
>> but that is rather unlikely.
>>
>> A good indication you are using a
Hi!
> There are only 2 cases:
>
> Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
>
> You could have a Packages file with
> 'dists///binary-/' that is used as if it hadn't
> but that is rather unlikely.
>
> A good indication you are using a Packages file wrong is also if all
> the packages it re
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
>> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
>> supposed to be?
>
> No
There are only 2 cases:
Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
You could
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
> supposed to be?
No
> > So all cases are explained by this or by the woody-proposed-updates
> > thingy.
>
> When will the woody-proposed-updates Packages files
Hi!
> The first few are not supposed to work with 'normal' sources.list
> entries, but with 'deb
> http:///debian/dists/sarge/main/update-kernel ./'.
I see, thanks.
Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
supposed to be?
> So all cases are explained by this or by t
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Jeroen wrote:
> > woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more point
> > release of woody, so the proposed-updates of it simply are no longer
> > relevant.
>
> I see. Thus, I simply have to wait until woody-proposed-up
Johann Glaser wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
>our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
>starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
>few weeks it complains about these missing files:
>
Hi!
> At least some of them are of woody-proposed-updates, which got dropped
> from the database, and hence from pool. Indeed, the corresponding
> Packages.gz files on the mirrors didn't get dropped yet, which is a
> minor bug.
>
> woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more poin
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
> our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
> starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
> few weeks it c
Hi!
Am Montag, den 04.07.2005, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
> > and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
> > list is dea
Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
> and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
> list is dead since the end of 2003. Therefore I try to ask this list, if
> you know anything about
Hi!
For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
list is dead since the end of 2003. Therefore I try to ask this list, if
you know anything about this discrepancy, if you can point me where I
should a
16 matches
Mail list logo
