ore likely kernel
> 3.x- and/or gcc-related, and I need somebody who knows more intimate
> workings of debian 7 before I can file a bug report to the correct
> topic/person:
>
> –– newer BIOS for my machine does not exist. Current/last is from
> 2009. And, like I wrote, it wo
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
> Again, I don't understand why you are becoming huffy and impolite. I am
> still trying to help you and you fail to follow my instructions. You
> are not helping your case at all and you are not showing yourself
> i
On 12/29/2013 05:59 AM, René Kuligowski wrote:
>> This is a common fallacy: Just because a piece of hardware is working
>> properly on Windows doesn't mean anything is adherent to the
>> specifications. The reason why your hardware is running on Windows
>> without any problems is that the manufactu
On 29.12.2013 01:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
This is a common fallacy: Just because a piece of hardware is working
properly on Windows doesn't mean anything is adherent to the
specifications. The reason why your hardware is running on Windows
without any problems is that the manufactu
Rene,
On 12/29/2013 04:06 AM, René Kuligowski wrote:
> OK, this is not fun when people just get pissed because they don't read
> –– or don't want to read –– what a person writes, and answer with
> thoughtless or arrogant statements. I didn't post this in debian-devel
> out of boredom; I wrote to
by getting one or the
> other response as to what might be the right thing.
No. As I said before, if it turns out to be the wrong package, the bug
report gets reassigned.
>> Also, you still need to be more specific. A bug report in the sense
>> of "Debian 7 crashes on my old
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 01:57 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote:
>
> On 28.12.2013 23:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 19:52 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Adrian,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I
> >> know):
> >> Sorr
OK, this is not fun when people just get pissed because they don't read
–– or don't want to read –– what a person writes, and answer with
thoughtless or arrogant statements. I didn't post this in debian-devel
out of boredom; I wrote to you because it didn't seem to fit anywhere else.
I thank
Original Message
Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 01:57:50 -0100
From: René Kuligowski
To: Ben Hutchings
On 28.12.2013 23:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 19:52 -0100, René Kuligowski wrote
other response as to what might be the right thing.
Also, you still need to be more specific. A bug report in the sense
of "Debian 7 crashes on my old computer, Debian 6 didn't", isn't helpful
at all. Debian comes with over 15.000 source packages and there are
billions of hardw
it is.
> The problem is far more likely kernel
> 3.x- and/or gcc-related, and I need somebody who knows more intimate
> workings of debian 7 before I can file a bug report to the correct
> topic/person:
But you just rejected the advice of one such person. Do you want advice
or not?
&g
l
> 3.x- and/or gcc-related, and I need somebody who knows more intimate
> workings of debian 7 before I can file a bug report to the correct
> topic/person:
You can still file the bug report against a particular package. If it
turns out to be assigned to the wrong package, we can still c
intimate
workings of debian 7 before I can file a bug report to the correct
topic/person:
–– newer BIOS for my machine does not exist. Current/last is from
2009. And, like I wrote, it works perfectly with debian 6 (kernel 2.6)
or winXP/win7. *without* *any* problems. And I don't exactly ca
le, write an installation report [4] which
will do most of that work for you. You just need to fill in the
missing information about the hardware and what worked and what not.
> Note: this does *not* happen in the i386 port of debian 7, which runs
> smoothly on my Acer AspireOne netbook wi
ssing ACPI ("try with newer BIOS"). The kernel
doesn't even recognize the power-off button. In debian 6, ACPI works
absolutely perfectly.
–– In addition, debian 7's 3.2 kernel seems to provoke diverse SIGSEGVs,
like the following:
When I use the Novula kernel module, th
ivchenko
> wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
> >>
> >> "Debian wheezy -- Installation Guide"
> >>
> >> What is Debian wheezy? I only downloaded 'Debian 7'.
>
>
"
>>
>> What is Debian wheezy? I only downloaded 'Debian 7'.
Darac> Wheezy is a brand. It's not really any different than "Snow
Darac> Leopard" or "XP". Do you expect people to care that one is
Darac> "10.6.8" an
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:19:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:56:00PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > Wheezy. It's obvious, isn't it? It comes between Squeeze and Jessie.
> >
> >
> > Wheezy is a brand.
> [...]
>
> No, it really isn't. Everything on the front page of
On 08/05/13 17:19, Mikael Livchenko wrote:
> also, why still using mailing list? this is the 2013. Mailing list is like
> living in 1993. spam bots love mail-list. mozilla bugzilla system is good
> chat system. the user e-mail address is hidden, and there is the login
> system. no one wants hund
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
> >
> >"Debian wheezy -- Installation Guide"
> >
> >What is Debian wheezy? I only downloaded 'Debian 7'.
> >wheezy is a nick name? where is it defined from the point of download?
I think Debian 7 is better than ubuntu 12. if debian can make documents like
ubuntu, ubuntu will end.
great job on Debian 7 it has made my night well!
thanks!
Mikael Livchenko, le Thu 09 May 2013 01:49:56 +1030, a écrit :
> no one wants hundreds of e-mail's in inbox.
I do want that instead of hundreds of bugzillas to have to subscribe to
and browse one by one.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
eezy -- Installation Guide"
>
>What is Debian wheezy? I only downloaded 'Debian 7'.
>wheezy is a nick name? where is it defined from the point of download? I
>cannot see it.
>I am guessing it is a nick name, but how many other people will know this?
Wheezy. It&
Debian developers have allot to learn
still in 2013 the documentation is flawed from the very first line.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
"Debian wheezy -- Installation Guide"
What is Debian wheezy? I only downloaded 'Debian 7'.
wheezy is a nick name?
24 matches
Mail list logo
