Hi
On 21-05-2024 1:08 p.m., Sean Whitton wrote:
PS: I've always wondered if the dgit server shouldn't track history, even if
uploads don't happen via it. A dgit clone could (should?) already provide
available history, even if no upload happened via it yet.
Well, 'dgit clone' adds a vcs-git rem
On Tue, 2024-05-21 at 09:11 -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > "Otto" == Otto Kekäläinen writes:
> Otto> Would you be kind and try to understand the opposing
> viewpoint
> Otto> by trying it for one day?
>
> Otto> You could go to
> Otto>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/
e for lapses that could have been easily avoided if Salsa-CI was
enabled.. (I did submit MR!20 though, you can just merge it)
I started this thread "Salsa - best thing in Debian in recent years?"
by asking people who resist Salsa to at least try using it for a while
before criticizing it
> "Otto" == Otto Kekäläinen writes:
Otto> Would you be kind and try to understand the opposing viewpoint
Otto> by trying it for one day?
Otto> You could go to
Otto> https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/-/merge_requests/19
Otto> and conduct a code review?
I have n
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 14:13, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:45:50PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 5/21/24 15:54, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> >
> > > > The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained packaging is also
> > > > a
> > > > duplicatio
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 04:11:02AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained packaging is also a
> duplication, and keeping the official VCS and git synchronized is causing
> additional work for developers, which is why people are opposed to having it
> man
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:45:50PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/21/24 15:54, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>
> > > The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained packaging is also a
> > > duplication, and keeping the official VCS and git synchronized is causing
> > > additional
Hi,
On 5/21/24 15:54, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained packaging is also a
duplication, and keeping the official VCS and git synchronized is causing
additional work for developers, which is why people are opposed to having it
mandated.
The Debi
Hello,
On Sun 19 May 2024 at 10:05am +02, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> PS: I've always wondered if the dgit server shouldn't track history, even if
> uploads don't happen via it. A dgit clone could (should?) already provide
> available history, even if no upload happened via it yet.
Well, 'dgit clone'
Hello,
On Sun 19 May 2024 at 12:32pm -07, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> You could go to
> https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/-/merge_requests/19 and
> conduct a code review?
>
> You might discover that GitLab is useful and is not duplicating
> Debbugs or anything else in Debian - it is curr
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 04:11:02AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> > My concern about Gitlab is not its *additions* to existing services, but
> > its *duplications* of core services already in Debian.
>
> I agree, that's the key problem.
>
> The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained pac
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 08:38:58PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Also debbugs is a special case:
> > The debbugs Debian package (as opposed to the debbugs software) have never
> > been
> > really maintained. I am actually one of the very few users of
> > Ideally debbugs should be made non-native so that some else could
> > maintain the Debian package.
>
> I'm happy to review patches that get the 2.6 branch of debbugs in shape
> where it can be released into Debian again if someone wants to take that
> effort. I've just assumed that anyone using
On Sun, 19 May 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Also debbugs is a special case:
> The debbugs Debian package (as opposed to the debbugs software) have never
> been
> really maintained. I am actually one of the very few users of this package
> and I tried several times to get the maintainers to do a n
Hi,
On 5/20/24 04:32, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
I agree that duplication is bad - but I disagree that use of version
control duplicates the use of the Debian archive for source code
storage, or that use of GitLab for code reviews would duplicate
Debbugs.
Outside of DM uploads, I'm not sure that
Thanks for reply Jonas,
> > You could go to
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/-/merge_requests/19 and
> > conduct a code review?
> >
> > You might discover that GitLab is useful and is not duplicating
> > Debbugs or anything else in Debian - it is currently the only platform
> > to
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-05-19 21:32:36)
> > > My concern about Gitlab is not its *additions* to existing services, but
> > > its *duplications* of core services already in Debian.
> >
> > I agree, that's the key problem.
>
> I agree that duplication is bad - but I disagree that use of versio
> > My concern about Gitlab is not its *additions* to existing services, but
> > its *duplications* of core services already in Debian.
>
> I agree, that's the key problem.
I agree that duplication is bad - but I disagree that use of version
control duplicates the use of the Debian archive for sou
Hi,
On 5/19/24 16:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
My concern about Gitlab is not its *additions* to existing services, but
its *duplications* of core services already in Debian.
I agree, that's the key problem.
The Debian archive itself is a VCS, so git-maintained packaging is also
a duplicatio
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:25:10PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi Bill and Wookey!
>
> In a recent long thread on debian-devel you had somewhat negative
> sentiments towards the usefulness of Salsa.
I am not sure this characterize my position. I have no opposition to
Salsa (even though it is
Quoting Mathias Behrle (2024-05-19 11:08:58)
> * Jonas Smedegaard: " Re: Salsa - best thing in Debian in recent years? (Re:
> finally end single-person maintainership)" (Sun, 19 May 2024 10:47:38
> +0200):
>
>
> > i.e. you are being
> > asocial if you don&
* Jonas Smedegaard: " Re: Salsa - best thing in Debian in recent years? (Re:
finally end single-person maintainership)" (Sun, 19 May 2024 10:47:38 +0200):
> i.e. you are being
> asocial if you don't, and can expect your behavior being discussed as a
> public-wide is
Quoting Paul Gevers (2024-05-19 10:05:38)
> In this discussion about mandating things, I've been wondering
>
> On 19-05-2024 9:11 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > * mandate VCS-tracking
> > * Yes
> > * mandate the use of one specific VCS
> > * Yes: git
>
> What do people think th
Two mistakes spotted
On 19-05-2024 10:05 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I think there's a large majority (maybe
even consensus) that believe you *should* have the packaging in VCS
I meant "at least should", as in "should or must".
I think what pere did [3]
[3]
https://people.skolelinux.org
Hi all,
In this discussion about mandating things, I've been wondering
On 19-05-2024 9:11 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* mandate VCS-tracking
* Yes
* mandate the use of one specific VCS
* Yes: git
What do people think this should mean, a *should* or *must* in policy?
That th
bbugs, you can use a
web-based email application - locally hosted or through a provider.
I already subscribe to Debbugs for the packages and teams I am most
interested in tracking contributions for.
> Personally I fully agree with the people stating that "Salsa is the
> best thing in
people stating that "Salsa is the
best thing in Debian in the past 20 years". So far everyone I talked
to who initially had reservations regarding using Salsa have started
liking it after they learned a bit more how it works, and have seen
things like Salsa-CI in action saving the Debi
lcf 于2018年12月6日周四 上午4:06写道：
>
> Hi
>
> My installed Debian version 9.5, is set up to use a Debian mirror in Denmark,
> which it also uses automatically when I install packages.
>
> When I make a system update, it automatically connects to a Swedish server
> with the address 151.101.84.133 SKYCA-
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:00 AM Flemming Christensen wrote:
> Server for system update of Debian in Sweden ?
In future, please ask these sort of questions on the user support channels:
https://www.debian.org/support
> My installed Debian version 9.5, is set up to use a Debian mirror in D
Hi
My installed Debian version 9.5, is set up to use a Debian mirror in Denmark,
which it also uses automatically when I install packages.
When I make a system update, it automatically connects to a Swedish server with
the address 151.101.84.133 SKYCA-3 Sweden. Is that OK?
Flemming Christense
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:42:32PM +, FlemmingChristensen wrote:
> Hi
> My installed Debian version 9.5, is set up to use a Debian mirror in
> Denmark, which it also uses automatically when I install packages.
>
> When I make a system update, it will automatically connects to a Swedish
> serve
Hi
My installed Debian version 9.5, is set up to use a Debian mirror in Denmark,
which it also uses automatically when I install packages.
When I make a system update, it will automatically connects to a Swedish server
with the address 151.101.84.133 SKYCA-3 Sweden. Is that OK?
Flemming Christe
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Andreas Jakowidis wrote:
> Developing - Devices - Scanner - Running Canon CanoScan 5600F Scanner on
> Debian in an official way?
In general, user support is off-topic on this mailing list.
In future, please contact Debian user support channels:
Developing - Devices - Scanner - Running Canon CanoScan 5600F Scanner on Debian in an official way?Is there an option to run a Canon CanoScan 5600F scanner on debian stretch, amd64 (x64): Or is there a possibilityin offering driver and/or tools in "debian buster" for that scanner/device
I would like to contribute somehow but I cannot travel to Montreal in April. Is
there a link to a "how can I contribute page?"
Wolf Halton, PCIP, CTGA, CBA
Mobile/Text 678-687-6104
--
Sent from my iPhone. Creative word completion courtesy of Apple, Inc.
> On Apr 9, 2017, at 11:18, Antoine Beau
Olivier Berger writes:
> Note that the OpenRISC isn't my main interest here, even if I mentioned
> jor1k.
>
> Simulating any other architecture may fit, as my purpose, so far would
> be to try and run a Debian system inside the browser... and the
> underlying CPU / simulator wouldn't matter much.
Hi.
Paul Wise writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
>> Is anyone working on a "port" of Debian for running in the browser,
>
> Probably WebAssembly is a better bet for a Debian port to browsers.
>
Interesting, but not ready for prime time yet, AFAIU.
>> over the J
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Is anyone working on a "port" of Debian for running in the browser,
Probably WebAssembly is a better bet for a Debian port to browsers.
> over the JS VM, like what jor1k [0] does ?
There was a Debian port to OpenRISC, but it is dead due
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is anyone working on a "port" of Debian for running in the browser,
> over the JS VM, like what jor1k [0] does ?
>
> I'm not sure where to check, so any hints welcome.
See Current Status on:
https://wiki.debian.org/Op
Hi.
Is anyone working on a "port" of Debian for running in the browser,
over the JS VM, like what jor1k [0] does ?
I'm not sure where to check, so any hints welcome.
I'm not exactly sure our toolchains would allow to perform that easily
enough...
Best regards,
[0] http://jor1k.com/
--
Olivier
Hi Angela,
> I am writing a blog at MeetAdvisors.com on companies that are driving
> their industries forward, I would love to include you!
>
> I'll be looking for why you do what you, what your passion is, and to
> gather a piece of advice you'd like to share with our community.
Have you got a
Hi Ian,
I am writing a blog at MeetAdvisors.com on companies that are driving
their industries forward, I would love to include you!
I'll be looking for why you do what you, what your passion is, and to
gather a piece of advice you'd like to share with our community.
Is there a time in the comin
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 03/30/2014 06:55 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Thomas Goirand:
> >> P.S: […] I find the concept of default app bad in itself, and I
> >> think users should be given the choice, and it isn't the role of a
> >> distribution to choose for its users.
> >
> > Most new use
come to drop these
>> transitional dummy packages (oh well and I accidentally dropped these
>> already and the packages are not transitioning) and I'm writing this
>> mail as part of Debian-IN (Debian India) team where we maintain all
>> Indian language fonts. Below i
pped these
> already and the packages are not transitioning) and I'm writing this
> mail as part of Debian-IN (Debian India) team where we maintain all
> Indian language fonts. Below is the set of fonts which we are planning
> to ask for removal from archive.
>
> 1. ttf-in
to allow smooth transition from ttf-* counter parts to fonts-*
counter parts. This was done in Wheezy and now time has come to drop these
transitional dummy packages (oh well and I accidentally dropped these
already and the packages are not transitioning) and I'm writing this
mail as part of Debian-IN
On 19/01/13 22:07, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/1/19 Daniel Pocock :
>
>>
>
>
>> A few weeks back, the pkg-monitoring team was created
>>
>> Although we currently look after Ganglia related stuff, it is not
>> exclusively for Ganglia, and could be a good way to collaborate on any
Hi,
2013/1/19 Daniel Pocock :
>
> A few weeks back, the pkg-monitoring team was created
>
> Although we currently look after Ganglia related stuff, it is not
> exclusively for Ganglia, and could be a good way to collaborate on any
> package related to metric collection, storage and analysis
>
>
A few weeks back, the pkg-monitoring team was created
Although we currently look after Ganglia related stuff, it is not
exclusively for Ganglia, and could be a good way to collaborate on any
package related to metric collection, storage and analysis
Anybody wishing to collaborate or migrate pac
Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim Cutts wrote:
>> What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so that
>> users could build software with decent dependency checking for their
>> shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into doing that?
>
> Could you use
On 6 Feb 2007, at 11:22 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/linux/install/xe_on_debian.html
(dunno whether that's what you need, but Oracle does support their
products on Debian these days, if I understand them correctly)
Yes, I know about that (and indeed have gi
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:38:46AM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
>
> On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:00 am, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> >(Sorry for the noise, I reply on the list since Sanger's mail server
> >thinks I am a spammer.
>
> Does it?
>
> >I am very interested to hear that Sanger is using Debian on
> >
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:09:59 +, Tim Cutts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes, indeed, because --root does a chroot() which requires root
> privilege. What I'm basically after is a dpkg-alike that uses a
> different root directory, but without using a chroot, so that non-
> root users can use it
On 2 Feb 2007, at 10:28 am, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:10:56PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg b
[Tim Cutts]
> No. The network admin didn't like the idea of all the mail
> messages. I think I might just ignore him though. :-)
Newer versions of popularity-contest deliver via HTTP, so you should
have that worry any more.
I see from popcon.debian.org we have 26962 submissions currently.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:10:56PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
> that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
> their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into
> doing that?
I knew peop
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tim Cutts wrote:
What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so
that users could build software with decent dependency checking for
their shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into
doing that?
I've heard about "click" (or "klick") which
Tim Cutts wrote:
> What I'd actually like is some sort of non-root packaging system so that
> users could build software with decent dependency checking for their
> shared software infrastructure. Can dpkg be cajoled into doing that?
Could you use a schroot instance to do that?
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:30 pm, Steffen Moeller wrote:
There is probably no point for Debian to compete in the package versions
with
upstream developers of BioPerl, Wise, EMBOSS and whatever other tools yours
and your neighbouring institutes' are providing :o)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:30 pm, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Have you installed the popularity-contest package?
No. The network admin didn't like the idea of all the mail
messages. I think I might just ignore him though. :-)
There is probably no poin
On Thursday 01 February 2007 11:38:46 Tim Cutts wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:00 am, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I am very interested to hear that Sanger is using Debian on
> > thousands of
> > machines. Do not hesitate to tell us a bit more on
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bioinformatics is part of our effo
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Tim Cutts wrote:
[... impresive numbers of Debian usage at Sanger ...]
Wow. ;-)
We're quite keen to present something about all this at Debconf; I realise
the deadline has passed, but hopefully they'll squeeze us in...
It would be great to meet you at DebConf, but would
On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:00 am, Charles Plessy wrote:
(Sorry for the noise, I reply on the list since Sanger's mail server
thinks I am a spammer.
Does it?
I am very interested to hear that Sanger is using Debian on
thousands of
machines. Do not hesitate to tell us a bit more on
[EMAIL PROTECTE
(Sorry for the noise, I reply on the list since Sanger's mail server
thinks I am a spammer.)
Le Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +, Tim Cutts a écrit :
> On 25 Jan 2007, at 1:23 am, James Troup wrote:
>
> > (a) we don't currently have the buildd infrastructure for this - it
> > would requ
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Now that GNOME (via pango) and KDE (via the upcoming Qt 3.2.0) have viable
> support, I wonder if there is any interest in a sub-project for increasing
> the support for Indian languages within Debian?
Good news come from India about this:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03
On Mon, 26 May 2003, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
> I have only noticed Tamil support so far, at least in KDE and GNOME. Do
> I need to get any packages at all to enable the Devnagri languages like
> Hindi and Marathi. If so, I would be grateful if you could list them.
For GNOME check out www.in
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Now that GNOME (via pango) and KDE (via the upcoming Qt 3.2.0) have viable
support, I wonder if there is any interest in a sub-project for increasing
I have only noticed Tamil support so far, at least in KDE and GNOME. Do
I need to get any packages at all to enable the Devna
Now that GNOME (via pango) and KDE (via the upcoming Qt 3.2.0) have viable
support, I wonder if there is any interest in a sub-project for increasing
the support for Indian languages within Debian?
The goals of Debian-IN as I see it would be to
1. Package Indic software or write it as necessary
Well here is a little good press...
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/personal/19990524/tech.html
Says,
Caldera Makers of OpenLinux.
Debian High-quality volunteer Linux.
Linux Pro Corporate-aimed implementation from WorkGroup Solutions.
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Is there soemthing like a real rescue disk? Or are we talking about the
> installation disks?
I was referring to "resq" installation boot disk.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble
des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject: debian in ROM (was: Re: Editor wars considered harmful)
>
>
>
>A minimal system (e.g., the debian "resq" disk) could fit on one
>of these cards, or an arbitraily larger system if more ROM was
>provided.
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, SirDibos wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Jon Rabone wrote:
> > >Or if anyone interested, make up a special ROM with kernel etc in it, so
> > >the machine will boot from ROM... Has anyone done this?
>
> > You'd need about 512 kB of ROM. Where are you going to put it? Ethercar
72 matches
Mail list logo
