Control: retitle -1 Request for new mailing list: debian-ai
Thanks for the various feedbacks. As pointed out by lamby, the
"debian-mlhwaccl" may be quite hard to search. Meanwhile, the name can
be overlength if we expand that abbreviation.
So I'm proposing to use a new list
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:20:26 -0600 (CST)
Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The benefits are great because the quality of the packages remains high.
>
> Irregardless of the package quality, the software itself, able to
> execute, load libraries, and run, or the dataset itself, confer
> The benefits are great because the quality of the packages remains high.
Irregardless of the package quality, the software itself, able to
execute, load libraries, and run, or the dataset itself, confers great
benefits to anyone who specifically requires those capabilities the
software provides,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 11:41 -0600, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> The issue of "automatic packaging" is IMHO a red-herring. Even if the
> rough packages are done completely by hand, the problem remains that
> there is a lot of useful, properly licensed software for which no
> package exists. Consequen
From: Isabel Drost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian-AI
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:17:28 +0100
> If your goal is to provide a comprehensive repository of AI software, I think
> you have forgotten some rather important AI projects on your list. You might
> want to hav
>
>> As a result of this, it has been my goal to assemble a comprehensive
>> software ontology of existing systems and package as many of them as
>> possible, ordered in such a way that the new packages can improve the
>> automatic creation of packages.
>
> I startet building Debian packages abou
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
One would not start a sub-project without lots of interest. Andreas
Tille points out that joining the Custom Debian Distribution effort
might make more sense than a sub-project.
Well, to be precise a "Custom Debian Distribution" _is_ (despite of
the
data source).
I am using debaux to completely automatically package Perl modules,
and for every package in CPAN would like to attempt to create a rough
quality package.
[0] http://frdcsa.onshore.net/frdcsa/internal/packager/
> > Would there be any interest in a Debian-AI sub-project?
>
From: Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian-AI
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 09:38:34 +0100
> [...]
> >
> > I am requesting comment on this approach, review of my project, and
> > looking for guidance. Though I have tried for 7 years, I have no
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> There is a lot of great libre software related to the field of
> Artificial Intelligence either directly or indirectly that has not
> been packaged yet for Debian.
>
> As a result of this, it has been my goal to assemble a comprehensive
> soft
the net.
Would there be any interest in a Debian-AI sub-project?
It sounds like you should think about joining the Custom Debian
Distribution effort:
http://wiki.debian.org/CustomDebian
http://people.debian.org/~tille/cdd/
If you are using the CDD tools you could gain some profit for
roject on
> the Debian channels, where they suggested I post to the Debian-devel
> mailing list.
>
> Would there be any interest in a Debian-AI sub-project?
>
Hmmm, I kind of fail to see the exact point: Are you really proposing a
sub-project related to AI software (like Debian-Med is
e. Though I have tried for 7 years, I have not
been able to make the breakthrough into the community (most likely
owing to a lack of social skills). I tried to discuss this project on
the Debian channels, where they suggested I post to the Debian-devel
mailing list.
Would there be any interest i
13 matches
Mail list logo
