Re: DPL teams survey summary summary

2008-07-22 Thread Vid . A
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve McIntyre spake thusly: >> >> Many of our developers are used to strong discussions and technical >> arguments in the course of Debian and Free Software development, but I >> was *shocked* to hear that one of our community ha

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary

2008-07-22 Thread Scott
Steve McIntyre spake thusly: > > Many of our developers are used to strong discussions and technical > arguments in the course of Debian and Free Software development, but I > was *shocked* to hear that one of our community has been the target of > death threats as a thank you for her work. I'm ho

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary [METOO]

2008-07-11 Thread s. keeling
Per Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 8. Publicise more clearly the places where new people could help > > out. I'm commonly asked by people how they could get involved in > > Debian, or what tasks most urgently need

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary

2008-07-11 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:20:00 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > As you may remember, back before I started the DPL job I promised to > run a survey. Thanks for your work! > 2. On the flip side of that, I'd also like to ask the members of the >teams that are acknowledged to perform well to help

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary

2008-07-08 Thread Per Andersson
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 8. Publicise more clearly the places where new people could help > out. I'm commonly asked by people how they could get involved in > Debian, or what tasks most urgently need help, and those are quite > difficult thi

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary

2008-06-29 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > 6. I found that people from quite a number of teams responded to the >survey, despite not being on my initial target list. That's not a >surprise! However, a more comprehensive, canonical single list of >teams would be ve