Re: DOAP files

2007-12-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
he peculiar thing we need to do is to standardize how to use upstream DOAP files. The few questions that comes to my mind right now are: - would it be enough to have them in a Debian source package or do we want to have them also in some Debian binary package (so that they will end up being insta

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-27 Thread Edd Dumbill
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:33:43PM +0800, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote: > > > 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?) &g

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Luca Brivio wrote: > BTW, I don't know what's with the "Collaborative Repository of > Meta-Informations"[1]. Maybe Raphael can provide some useful insights to the > debate. Well, CRMI is still a concept, we got mole implemented by Jeroen which helps a lot in archive-wide sca

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-26 Thread Luca Brivio
mer 26 dicembre 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto: > I see two ways of serving it that seem to me much more useful: provide a > centralized, archive-wide place, where we serve all the DOAPs of Debian > packages. The more obvious places to me seem packages.d.o and/or the > PTS. BTW, I don't know

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-26 Thread Enrico Zini
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote: > > 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?) > Why not :) I'd like too. > I see two ways of serving it that seem to

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote: > 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?) Why not :) > 2) If so, where? (usr/share/doc sounds OK if they are only provided for sake > of completeness, while IMVHO if we want them to be globally p

Re: DOAP files

2007-12-25 Thread brian m. carlson
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:32AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote: 1) Should we include DOAP files from upstream in packages? (always?) I think it's a good idea. 2) If so, where? (usr/share/doc sounds OK if they are only provided for sake of completeness, while IMVHO if we want them to be glo

DOAP files

2007-12-25 Thread Luca Brivio
les: flumotion: usr/share/doc/flumotion/flumotion.doap.gz mach: usr/share/doc/mach/mach.doap.gz python-gst0.10: usr/share/doc/python-gst0.10/gst-python.doap I haven't be found any quick way to search the Debian source archive for file names, but Google Code Search provided[4] me with a rough e