It would probably more helpful to approach our release team asking for
advice how to proceed with transition than sending this blunt rant into d-d.
O.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d
>
> [short explanation for d-d: debian
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Thanks for the helpful comment instead of fixing things.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.in
Dear Norbert,
I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Not sure if you get why, oh, my.
I'll give you a little hint:
always assume the worst,
spread the word,
and for maximum impact,
put names in subject too.
This really really helps and is super joyful.
cheers,
Holger
signature.a
Hi David,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
> the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
> feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
> convenient dummy transitional packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Norbert,
Le 03/09/2013 02:10, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Are you planning to block TeX Live transition for unforeseeable future?
Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see
Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d
[short explanation for d-d: debian-edu-doc has a serious bug since it
build-deps on a not existing package. Instead of transiting to the
new pakcage naming, it keeps the old anme hindering transition)
On Do, 15 Aug 2013, Norbert Preining wrote:
> th
6 matches
Mail list logo
