On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:41:15PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> But if -jN breaks, that's because the package is not parallel build
> safe, so using -J will not improve things, as the package has not
> opted in (or has opted out depending on the debhelper used) from
> parallel builds anyway.
The g
On 2018-01-31 14:41, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 07:35:32 +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
Using parallel build (-jX) fails for us, so it takes ~13h to compile
that gcc. I was told to use '-J' instead, but that is not supported by
dpkg-buildpackage in Debian-Stretch :-(
dpkg-buil
Hi!
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 07:35:32 +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Using parallel build (-jX) fails for us, so it takes ~13h to compile
> that gcc. I was told to use '-J' instead, but that is not supported by
> dpkg-buildpackage in Debian-Stretch :-(
dpkg-buildpackage does support -J in stretch (sta
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 07:35:32AM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Using parallel build (-jX) fails for us, so it takes ~13h to compile
> that gcc. I was told to use '-J' instead, but that is not supported by
> dpkg-buildpackage in Debian-Stretch :-(
You can always use DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n ins
Robin Geuze schrieb:
> I was wondering, are the debian maintainers planning on backporting the
> -mindirect-branch=thunk support introduced in GCC 7.3 and 8.1 to the
> compilers available on Jessie and Stretch? While this is not necessarily
> a security fix for the compiler it does provide that
Philipp Hahn wrote:
> PS: Here are the 7 relevant GIT commpits for gcc-4.9 from H.J. Lu's GIT
> repository for reference:
>> 1fb3a1828fa x86: Disallow -mindirect-branch=/-mfunction-return= with
>> -mcmodel=large
>> 7ab5b649f72 x86: Add 'V' register operand modifier
>> 5550079949a x86: Add -mindire
Hello,
Am 30.01.2018 um 08:43 schrieb Robin Geuze:
> I was wondering, are the debian maintainers planning on backporting the
> -mindirect-branch=thunk support introduced in GCC 7.3 and 8.1 to the
> compilers available on Jessie and Stretch? While this is not necessarily
> a security fix for the co
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Robin Geuze wrote:
> I was wondering, are the debian maintainers planning on backporting the
> -mindirect-branch=thunk support introduced in GCC 7.3 and 8.1 to the
> compilers available on Jessie and Stretch? While this is not necessarily a
> security fix for the c
Hey,
I was wondering, are the debian maintainers planning on backporting the
-mindirect-branch=thunk support introduced in GCC 7.3 and 8.1 to the
compilers available on Jessie and Stretch? While this is not necessarily
a security fix for the compiler it does provide that fix to at least
kerne
9 matches
Mail list logo
