Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 19:25 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia : > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the >> team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-). > > I've never denied that: [1] > However you have to give peopl

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote: > While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the > team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-). I've never denied that: [1] However you have to give people enough time to ***think***, ***review*** things, and ***speak up*

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

2015-06-18 18:30 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey : > Hi Alessio, > > 2015-06-18 18:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia : >> Hello everybody, >> >> I am afraid that I have to inform you that Bálint's blog post [1] >> about the current status of libav's provided is untrue as there's >> still a discussion ongoing on

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 18:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia : > Hello everybody, > > I am afraid that I have to inform you that Bálint's blog post [1] > about the current status of libav's provided is untrue as there's > still a discussion ongoing on the Debian Multimedia Maintainers' team > mailing li

Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hello everybody, I am afraid that I have to inform you that Bálint's blog post [1] about the current status of libav's provided is untrue as there's still a discussion ongoing on the Debian Multimedia Maintainers' team mailing list, and a clear outcome is yet to come. We'll eventually get in touch