Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules

2006-06-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking >> for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) >> is that the archive has switched from g

Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules

2006-06-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking > for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is > that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64 > kernel (at le

Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules

2006-06-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Hello all, I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64 kernel (at least -- I haven't checked other architectures) was built wi