On 23/09/2012 17:49, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2012, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
The DM flag (and in future ACL) shows that one trusts that one DM
to do a good job on that one package. Extending it like "this DM
may upload all packages of [whateverbiglist]" is jus
On 23/09/2012 17:49, Joachim Breitner wrote:
we need to upload all>450 packages with no source change
That's called a binNMU and is very simple to schedule, as you already
know ;)
In the OCaml team, we have the very same issue and we try to avoid
arch:all packages for libraries and application
Le lundi 24 septembre 2012 23:53:01, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > package X would depend on the maintainer field of the packages *already*
> > in Debian, not the one in the package he uploads. Just the way it is at
>
> One way to re
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 11:59 -0500 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> > [Joachim Breitner]
> > > Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
> > > packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
> > > e.g. pkg-haske
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 11:59 -0500 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> [Joachim Breitner]
> > Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
> > packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
> > e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o? Bonus points if such an
> > assigment is expanded at di
[Joachim Breitner]
> Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
> packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
> e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o? Bonus points if such an
> assigment is expanded at dinstall time, so that the statement “DM
> 1234 may upload all packages owned by
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:13:08PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> (BTW, source only uploads anyone? Then I can easily do the uploads on my
> own and need neither the DDs nor the DMs in my team to do what computers
> can do better.)
If it's happening often enough, you may want to think about crea
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.09.2012, 00:26 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> On 09/23/2012 11:49 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Also, the real time-consuming work for us is when we
> > need to upload all>450 packages with no source change, or a trivial
> > one.
> Someone assigned with such task as modify
On 09/23/2012 11:49 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, the real time-consuming work for us is when we
need to upload all>450 packages with no source change, or a trivial
one.
Someone assigned with such task as modifying (even trivially)
and uploading 450 packages should definitively be(come) a DD
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2012, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> The DM flag (and in future ACL) shows that one trusts that one DM to do
> a good job on that one package. Extending it like "this DM may upload
> all packages of [whateverbiglist]" is just wrong.
>
> > (Of course this is just co
On 12978 March 1977, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of packages
> not by name, but by Maintainer, e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o?
Not with the current setup. We have a m:n relation between DMs and
source packages. It's an interesting ide
Hi!
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 10:06:35 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> This new interface replaces the old DMUA field. The old field will stop
> working on the 24th of November 2012, from then on only packages
> explicitly granted upload permission to their DMs using the interface
> described here wi
Quoting Gergely Nagy (alger...@madhouse-project.org):
> Yep, that is one of the solutions I mentioned earlier. Therefore, if a
> DM does care, migrating to the new system is by all means possible, and
> they have very little to do, they will not be punished for another
> person's absence or mistak
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.09.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
> During the FTPMaster meeting last week we have implemented the new
> interface for managing DM permissions[1].
very cool stuff, this makes DMs much more useful in teams with a large
amount of packages, thanks a lot!
Would it
Paul Tagliamonte writes:
> If any DM asks me to, and they can show they've made uploads (with
> DMUA) before this announcement for that package, and that they've not
> broken things in a gnarly gnarly way (and if their sponsor is VAC,
> MIA or otherwise not here), I don't think I'd have any probl
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Arno Tröll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > We are using this opportunity to clean up the "DM database" and will not
> > convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
> > be enough for any active
Arno Töll writes:
> On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> We are using this opportunity to clean up the "DM database" and will not
>> convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
>> be enough for any active DM to ensure their sponsor DDs have set the new
>> p
Hi,
On 22.09.2012 10:06, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> We are using this opportunity to clean up the "DM database" and will not
> convert any of the DMUA flags to the new format, but two months ought to
> be enough for any active DM to ensure their sponsor DDs have set the new
> permission.
please do
18 matches
Mail list logo
