Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> estimate
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 13:43:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hope nobody will object if the report is sent in the next Misc Developer
> News :).
>
It doesn't need to be on -devel-announce. Just send it here.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> es
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Thinking a little bit more, I believe writing some kind of report might be
of more use. Of course if I find something really relevant I might end up
filing a couple of bugs (I remember seeing something that looked like a
library name being changed in the reb
On 15/07/08 at 10:33 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > > because there are some manpage warnings that
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> > lintian.d.o's results or the
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi
> * MBF based on the issues found (when lintian reports more issues on the
> rebuilt package) [1] .
No
MBF shouldn't be done for lintian warnings/errors unless the particular
warning/error is discussed on d-devel and the consensus is that it's
worth to MBF
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
> estimate the number of affected packa
On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
> estimate the number of affected
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:58:56PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > [2] Haven't found any example of these, yet.
>
> Here's one:
>
> $ \diff -u xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian
> --- xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian2008-07-12 20:52:30.00
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [2] Haven't found any example of these, yet.
Here's one:
$ \diff -u xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian
--- xabacus_7.1.7-1_i386.lintian2008-07-12 20:52:30.0 -0500
+++ xabacus_7.1.7-1+b1_i386.lintian 2008-07-12 20:52:38.00
Hi all,
Probably a week or two ago I contacted Lucas Nussbaum to ask him if he could
run lintian on the results of his packages rebuild so they could be compared
against the results from lintian.d.o to detect package changes (i.e. new or
less lintian-detected issues).
I have just started to co
12 matches
Mail list logo
