On May 22, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I think at this point we can recommend dh, and require debhelper (i.e.,
> the individual dh_* tools could be required to be part of the build
> system, but how they are called can be left to a maintainer's
> discretion, with the assumption that "you use dh or p
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:37:59PM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
> On the more general topic, I believe there should be room for new tools to
> emerge and not-being-dh should never be a RC or even important bug.
My thoughts exactly.
I think at this point we can recommend dh, and require debh
Quack,
On 2019-05-14 11:24, Sean Whitton wrote:
Switching the entire Haskell ecosystem over to use dh would be a
massive
amount of work, as the new dh_haskell would need a lot of testing etc.
So Haskell libraries and apps would probably have to be one of the
exceptions.
It took months to get
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:35:21AM -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-05-14 07:59, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> > i've migrated many of my packages from cdbs to dh, but there's one
> > feature which cdbs sports and which i miss strongly (at least: the last
> > time i checked) in dh (so much, t
Mo Zhou writes ("Re: Cdbs Features"):
> On 2019-05-14 07:59, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> > that is: building the same code-base multiple times, with differing
> > configurations.
>
> Could you please provide some examples about the case you mentioned?
> I n
On 14.05.19 14:35, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I'm quite interested in taking a look at how cdbs deal with such case.
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/snd/blob/master/debian/rules
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/soundscaperenderer/blob/master/debian/rules
gfmdsrt
IOhannes
Hi,
On 2019-05-14 07:59, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> i've migrated many of my packages from cdbs to dh, but there's one
> feature which cdbs sports and which i miss strongly (at least: the last
> time i checked) in dh (so much, that i haven't converted a couple of
> packages): building of multiple
On 13.05.19 18:22, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
> Holger> - packages using cdbs. cdbs has features dh doesnt have and
> Holger> I dont think it's wrong to use cdbs. (
>
> Just for my information, what are the big features cdbs has that dh does
> not?
>
Hello Sam,
On Mon 13 May 2019 at 12:22PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
> Holger> - packages using cdbs. cdbs has features dh doesnt have and
> Holger> I dont think it's wrong to use cdbs. (
>
> Just for my information, what are the big features cdbs has
> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
Holger> - packages using cdbs. cdbs has features dh doesnt have and
Holger> I dont think it's wrong to use cdbs. (
Just for my information, what are the big features cdbs has that dh does
not?
10 matches
Mail list logo
