> The terms of the suit require MS to give _Caldera_ details of APIs. Not
> the general public, just Caldera. MS can still keep them under non-disclosure,
> and Caldera would have to honor the terms of an NDA approved by the court.
I noticed this too. It could just be necessary to make the lawsui
From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm just posting here on what's really an irrelevant topic to say that
> I think it's a very good thing that someone is challenging Microsoft.
The terms of the suit require MS to give _Caldera_ details of APIs. Not
the general public, just Caldera. MS can s
Ian Jackson:
> I mailed Lyle Ball at Caldera to tell him so, and he thanked me for my
> support and said:
> > Please be vocal about your opinions
> > on this case, especially on the forums.
>
> So, here I am in my favourite forum :-). If you want to discuss this
> somewhere here probably isn't it
I should think that you've all heard about this by now - if not go and
look at comp.os.linux.announce.
I'm just posting here on what's really an irrelevant topic to say that
I think it's a very good thing that someone is challenging Microsoft.
I mailed Lyle Ball at Caldera to tell him so, and he
4 matches
Mail list logo
