> > Kachina Technologies is strongly interested in Debian Sparc for the
> > hardware they distribute. They are offering resources for this effort with
> > the goal being a "commercial" grade Debian distribution.
Hi. I know this isn't the time, place, method or means, but please allow
me to introdu
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Kachina Technologies is willing to provide hardware resources and any
> other help we might need to make this project a reality. They have even
> offered heavily discounted (50%) prices on development machines for
> "selected" developers.
What sort of m
> > What do people think of creating a new ftp directory called say,
> > "sci"? Many of the packages in Scientific Applications for Linux
> > don't fit cleanly into "math".
> >
>
> I would leave it the way it is. "Scientific" is not well defined. To a
> certain extent it's not defined at all.
To the extent that I have a goal in Debian , its packaging these
things (I've already done three or four) . For the time being, I am
putting it all in 'math'. We may want to change the name or granularity at
some point, if packging these things really takes off. I agree that 'sci'
would b
Hi, Johnie!
>
> Some SAL classifications include chemistry, biology, artificial
> intelligence, physics, astronomy, relational DBMS, parallel computing,
> geographic information systems, and scientific data processing and
> visualization, some of which are poorly described by "math".
>
Agreed.
"Alexander" == Alexander Kushnirenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> I would leave it the way it is. "Scientific" is not well
Alexander> defined. To a certain extent it's not defined at all.
Some SAL classifications include chemistry, biology, artificial
intelligence, physics, astronomy
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 04:07:11PM -0400, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> > What do people think of creating a new ftp directory called say,
> > "sci"? Many of the packages in Scientific Applications for Linux
> > don't fit cleanly into "math".
> >
>
> I would leave it the way it is.
Hi,
>
> What do people think of creating a new ftp directory called say,
> "sci"? Many of the packages in Scientific Applications for Linux
> don't fit cleanly into "math".
>
I would leave it the way it is. "Scientific" is not well defined. To a
certain extent it's not defined at all.
Sasha
"Alexander" == Alexander Kushnirenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> So perhaps if you are going to work with them you could let
Alexander> them know about Packages in Debian and they may want to
Alexander> update there Web Page. I know that many of my colleagues
Alexander> use this page
Hi,
>
> Kachina Technologies is strongly interested in Debian Sparc for the
> hardware they distribute. They are offering resources for this effort with
> the goal being a "commercial" grade Debian distribution.
>
I have a little comment which is not quite you were asking for. But perhaps
it
I don't know how many of you saw the posting Nils made to debian-announce
a while back, so I will give some background:
Kachina Technologies is strongly interested in Debian Sparc for the
hardware they distribute. They are offering resources for this effort with
the goal being a "commercial" grade
11 matches
Mail list logo
