On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For the moment, the answer is:
> > As a side effect trying to build ghc6 on MIPS, many (hundreds?) other
> > packages are blocked from migrating to testing for more than a m
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The buildd queues aren't FIFO, this has been explained already a
>> dozen times if not more.
>
> And every time that discussion surfaces, suggestions to include age in
> the formula used to calculate the build order are presented. Also
> suggestio
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the moment, the answer is:
>
> As a side effect trying to build ghc6 on MIPS, many (hundreds?) other
> packages are blocked from migrating to testing for more than a month.
Eh, what? You think that mips* is the problem here? What about the
missi
[Julien BLACHE]
>> Clearly, in the conflict of interest between the ghc6 MIPS users, and
>> the testing users on other arches, a choice has been made, of which I am
>> unhappy.
>
> No choice has been made. I don't know what you're on, but you'd better
> put it off.
The "I don't know what you're o
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> He doesn't have to use unstable. He can use pinning for this specific
>> package.
>
> Sure, and he can also use dpkg -i. The question is: why should we ask
> him to make the effort?
He is using testing. We never made any commitment wrt availability in
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:28:42PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 2) The obvious solution is to add SATA disks to the buildds, this is
>currently in the works.
rem.rfc822.org done since 2008-02-22 - 120GB PATA Disk on a Promise UDMA
133 Controller.
> 1) Upgrades to 1-2 GB RAM are also currentl
On 2008-03-01, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ask:
> - Who is in charge for taking such a decision ?
Release team
> - Where can I appeal ?
Tech-ctte
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 12:15:17PM +0100, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> He doesn't have to use unstable. He can use pinning for this specific
> package.
Sure, and he can also use dpkg -i. The question is: why should we ask
him to make the effort?
For
Le Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 10:45:31AM +0100, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
>
> So you might devote your time to
>
> a) Find the cause of the build crash
> b) Hunt down the kernel bug in 2.6.24
> c) Poke at the buildd admin to move the buildd to the new disk subsys
This is ridiculus and provocative. I h
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:40:57AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
> >
> > Due to kernel problems, the mips* buildds haven't been very reliable in
> > the past few weeks, creating a lng backlog of packages that need to
> > be built. As there seems to be a workar
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> packages migrate? I just got a message from a user who wants to use one
> of the blocked packages (emboss), and I am just so ashamed to answer him
> that he has to use unstable just because it is not built on a platform
> where nobody is using it.
He do
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 12:36:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> it is good news to read that there is a solution being found. However, I
> am a bit confused because previous messages were suggesting that the
> problem was disk speed, not downtime.
Downtime caused by ghc6 build causing multiple k
Le Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:40:57AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
>
> Due to kernel problems, the mips* buildds haven't been very reliable in
> the past few weeks, creating a lng backlog of packages that need to
> be built. As there seems to be a workaround for the kernel bug, this
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
