On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 07:49:30AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:29:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > So yes, please re-add the dependency on libxml2-dev for the time being.
> >
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:29:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So yes, please re-add the dependency on libxml2-dev for the time being.
>
> > We're still not so much in a rush.
>
> Yes, we *are*. The RC bug
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > So yes, please re-add the dependency on libxml2-dev for the time being.
> We're still not so much in a rush.
Yes, we *are*. The RC bug count for etch is currently moving in the wrong
direction, and having dozens of FTBFS bugs added
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:44:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Mic
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > A number of applications currently fail to build with something like:
>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > A number of applications currently fail to build with
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 11:16]:
> One grave bug on libxml2, please. The common case of linking against
> libxml2 using libtool is now broken, for no discernable reason. This is
> irresponsible library maintenance; it shouldn't be left to the maintainers
> of all the *othe
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > A number of applications currently fail to build with something like:
>
> > | sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ots ots.o ../src/.libs/libo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> A number of applications currently fail to build with something like:
> | sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ots ots.o ../src/.libs/libots-1.so
> /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -ldl -lz -lm /usr/lib/libpopt.so
> | /
A number of applications currently fail to build with something like:
| sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ots ots.o ../src/.libs/libots-1.so
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -ldl -lz -lm /usr/lib/libpopt.so
| /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
In bug #378494, filed on one of these package
10 matches
Mail list logo