Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-26 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote: > > - I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine > > md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked. > > > - the following duplicates the c

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote: > - I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked. > - the following duplicates the call to fix_www_data_perm for > /var/cache/bugzilla, and in addition, this chan

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In linux.debian.devel, you wrote: > > It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently > > not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs. > > > > If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that

Re: Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote: > It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently > not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs. > > If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that is > is in woody, so not shipping it in Sarge would be a regression, and > le

Bugzilla package in need of help

2004-10-19 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Hi list, It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs. Its maintainer seems to be busy, and in order to get this package elegible for inclusion in Sarge, uploads fixing those bugs are urgently needed. Note that currently there is stil