Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Isn't it time to remove emacs19 from unstable? The emacs20 package is more
> than 2 1/2 years old and RMS said that emacs19 is no longer supported
> upstream.
Emacs 20 is too painfully slow for anyone who doesn't need the
mule, and has some bugs, s
>> Isn't it time to remove emacs19 from unstable? The emacs20 package is more
>> than 2 1/2 years old and RMS said that emacs19 is no longer supported
>> upstream.
In fact, it is in the WNPP with an intent-to-orphan... but people seem
to care enough to keep doing NMU's...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For your amusement: (it's actually been a year or two since I last posted
> this now too... The comments are probably pretty outdated)
>
> Bugs Over Two Years Old
>...
>Package: emacs19
>Ma
3 matches
Mail list logo
