Re: Bugs being closed but still outstanding

2007-07-30 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Monday 30 July 2007 00:15, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:09:11PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the > > outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some > > time. These bugs remain closed (

Re: Bugs being closed but still outstanding

2007-07-29 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:15:47AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > thank hurd-i386 for this. (or any arch where your package does not > build). I wish the bts would ignore non RC archs by default :| Just for the record, bugscan (and by extension these days, britney) ignores non-RC archs. /* St

Re: Bugs being closed but still outstanding

2007-07-29 Thread Joey Hess
John Goerzen wrote: > I am perplexed by this. > > If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the > outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some time. > These bugs remain closed (were not reopened), the BTS page for each bug > knows about that, yet

Re: Bugs being closed but still outstanding

2007-07-29 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:09:11PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi, > > I am perplexed by this. > > If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the > outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some time. > These bugs remain closed (were not reopened),

Bugs being closed but still outstanding

2007-07-29 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, I am perplexed by this. If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some time. These bugs remain closed (were not reopened), the BTS page for each bug knows about that, yet they are still listed under